Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSUCX vs RGAHX
HSUCX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts HSUCX vs RGAHX
Rational Dynamic Brands C
Price$33.31
Change+$0.39 (+1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.32M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$81.72
Change+$0.80 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
HSUCX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSUCX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSUCX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. HSUCX (75.3M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than HSUCX: RGAHX (0.47) vs HSUCX (0.00). HSUCX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: HSUCX (12 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). HSUCX (2.15) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). HSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 340.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSUCX: RGAHX (250) vs HSUCX (1000). HSUCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.69 vs. RGAHX (10.98). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 50.13 vs. HSUCX (6.80).
| HSUCX | RGAHX | HSUCX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 0.44 | 489% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 0.44 | 489% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.127 | 11.275 | 28% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.3M | 323B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.47 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.69 | 10.98 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.41 | 60.14 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.80 | 50.13 | 14% |
| Returns for 10 years | -82.83 | N/A | - |