Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSUCX vs RGAHX
HSUCX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts HSUCX vs RGAHX
Rational Dynamic Brands C
Price$32.91
Change-$0.24 (-0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.89M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$87.59
Change-$1.37 (-1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
HSUCX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSUCX vs. RGAHX commentary
Dec 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSUCX is a Buy and RGAHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. HSUCX (65.9M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than HSUCX: RGAHX (0.44) vs HSUCX (0.00). HSUCX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: HSUCX (12 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). HSUCX (2.15) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). HSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 340.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSUCX: RGAHX (250) vs HSUCX (1000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.96 vs. HSUCX (-2.59). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 34.15 vs. HSUCX (-13.11).
| HSUCX | RGAHX | HSUCX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 0.44 | 489% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 0.44 | 489% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.632 | 21.133 | 12% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 65.9M | 339B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.59 | 6.96 | -37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.74 | 69.28 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.11 | 34.15 | -38% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.83 | 103.33 | -9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement