Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSUCX vs RGACX
HSUCX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts HSUCX vs RGACX
Rational Dynamic Brands C
Price$34.02
Change+$0.22 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.13M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.62
Change+$0.46 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
HSUCX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSUCX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSUCX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. HSUCX (71.1M). RGACX pays higher dividends than HSUCX: RGACX (0.07) vs HSUCX (0.00). HSUCX was incepted earlier than RGACX: HSUCX (12 years) vs RGACX (23 years). HSUCX (2.15) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). HSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 340.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSUCX: RGACX (250) vs HSUCX (1000). HSUCX (21.15) and RGACX (21.05) have marching annual gain over last year. RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 42.51 vs. HSUCX (-0.76).
| HSUCX | RGACX | HSUCX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 0.94 | 229% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 0.94 | 229% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.325 | 16.155 | 33% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 71.1M | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.15 | 21.05 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.54 | 51.55 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.76 | 42.51 | -2% |
| Returns for 10 years | -81.24 | 97.10 | -84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement