Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSUCX vs RGACX
HSUCX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts HSUCX vs RGACX
Rational Dynamic Brands C
Price$33.53
Change+$0.11 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.56M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.10
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
HSUCX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSUCX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSUCX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. HSUCX (74.6M). RGACX pays higher dividends than HSUCX: RGACX (0.07) vs HSUCX (0.00). HSUCX was incepted earlier than RGACX: HSUCX (12 years) vs RGACX (23 years). HSUCX (2.15) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). HSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 340.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSUCX: RGACX (250) vs HSUCX (1000). HSUCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.34 vs. RGACX (14.08). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 41.95 vs. HSUCX (0.93).
| HSUCX | RGACX | HSUCX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 0.94 | 229% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 0.94 | 229% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.808 | 14.044 | 27% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.6M | 329B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.34 | 14.08 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.12 | 41.19 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.93 | 41.95 | 2% |
| Returns for 10 years | -82.18 | 83.68 | -98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement