Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSUAX vs RGACX
HSUAX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts HSUAX vs RGACX
Rational Dynamic Brands A
Price$41.11
Change-$0.23 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.12M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.29
Change+$0.19 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.93B
HSUAX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSUAX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSUAX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. HSUAX (74.1M). RGACX pays higher dividends than HSUAX: RGACX (0.07) vs HSUAX (0.00). HSUAX was incepted earlier than RGACX: HSUAX (23 years) vs RGACX (23 years). HSUAX (1.46) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). HSUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 340.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSUAX: RGACX (250) vs HSUAX (1000). HSUAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.51 vs. RGACX (14.41). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.92 vs. HSUAX (7.28).
| HSUAX | RGACX | HSUAX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.94 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.94 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.656 | 14.308 | 26% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.1M | 329B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.51 | 14.41 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.47 | 45.56 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.28 | 40.92 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | -76.85 | 96.18 | -80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement