HSTXF
Price
$0.39
Change
-$0.02 (-4.88%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
NCAUF
Price
$0.22
Change
-$0.02 (-8.33%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

HSTXF vs NCAUF

Header iconHSTXF vs NCAUF Comparison
Open Charts HSTXF vs NCAUFBanner chart's image
Heliostar Metals
Price$0.39
Change-$0.02 (-4.88%)
Volume$114.65K
CapitalizationN/A
Newcore Gold
Price$0.22
Change-$0.02 (-8.33%)
Volume$29.9K
CapitalizationN/A
HSTXF vs NCAUF Comparison Chart
Loading...
HSTXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HSTXF vs. NCAUF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSTXF is a Hold and NCAUF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (HSTXF: $0.39 vs. NCAUF: $0.22)
Brand notoriety: HSTXF and NCAUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HSTXF: 88% vs. NCAUF: 33%
Market capitalization -- HSTXF: $36.47M vs. NCAUF: $18.78M
HSTXF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $36.47M. NCAUF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $18.78M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HSTXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNCAUF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HSTXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NCAUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NCAUF is a better buy in the long-term than HSTXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HSTXF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • HSTXF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

HSTXF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -11.31% price change this week, while NCAUF (@Precious Metals) price change was +0.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -3.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-3.68% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSTXF($36.5M) has a higher market cap than NCAUF($18.8M). NCAUF YTD gains are higher at: 111.629 vs. HSTXF (83.306). NCAUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.4M vs. HSTXF (-5.9M). NCAUF has more cash in the bank: 2.27M vs. HSTXF (908K). HSTXF (0) and NCAUF (0) have equivalent revenues.
HSTXFNCAUFHSTXF / NCAUF
Capitalization36.5M18.8M194%
EBITDA-5.9M-2.4M246%
Gain YTD83.306111.62975%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash908K2.27M40%
Total Debt171KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HSTXF vs NCAUF: Fundamental Ratings
HSTXF
NCAUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6158
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9082
SMR RATING
1..100
9792
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3640
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NCAUF's Valuation (38) in the null industry is in the same range as HSTXF (60). This means that NCAUF’s stock grew similarly to HSTXF’s over the last 12 months.

NCAUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as HSTXF (90). This means that NCAUF’s stock grew similarly to HSTXF’s over the last 12 months.

NCAUF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as HSTXF (97). This means that NCAUF’s stock grew similarly to HSTXF’s over the last 12 months.

HSTXF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as NCAUF (40). This means that HSTXF’s stock grew similarly to NCAUF’s over the last 12 months.

HSTXF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NCAUF (100). This means that HSTXF’s stock grew similarly to NCAUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HSTXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HSTXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME31.261.82
+6.18%
GameStop Corp
TSLA479.8616.84
+3.64%
Tesla
AAPL253.482.44
+0.97%
Apple
BTC.X106140.600000110.890625
+0.10%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY604.29-2.50
-0.41%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust

HSTXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HSTXF and LGDTF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HSTXF and LGDTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HSTXF
1D Price
Change %
HSTXF100%
-3.23%
LGDTF - HSTXF
32%
Poorly correlated
-3.13%
DSVSF - HSTXF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.25%
STLRF - HSTXF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.46%
GSVRF - HSTXF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.89%
JAGGF - HSTXF
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.24%
More

NCAUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NCAUF and BLTMF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NCAUF and BLTMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NCAUF
1D Price
Change %
NCAUF100%
-7.94%
BLTMF - NCAUF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KUYAF - NCAUF
26%
Poorly correlated
-4.80%
HSTXF - NCAUF
25%
Poorly correlated
-3.23%
CGLCF - NCAUF
23%
Poorly correlated
-3.57%
HMY - NCAUF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.14%
More