Advertisement
HSTM vs LQWDF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSTM is a Hold and LQWDF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HSTM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLQWDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- HSTM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- LQWDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HSTM’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LQWDF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HSTM’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
- LQWDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
HSTM (@Services to the Health Industry) experienced а -3.60% price change this week, while LQWDF (@Packaged Software) price change was +37.83% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was -3.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.20%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +68.94%.
Reported Earning Dates
HSTM is expected to report earnings on Feb 23, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Services to the Health Industry (-3.78% weekly)This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.
@Packaged Software (-2.14% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| HSTM | LQWDF | HSTM / LQWDF | |
| Capitalization | 650M | 31.6M | 2,057% |
| EBITDA | 65.4M | -2.12M | -3,092% |
| Gain YTD | -4.941 | 49.457 | -10% |
| P/E Ratio | 32.24 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 299M | 8.18K | 3,656,151% |
| Total Cash | 92.6M | 1.33M | 6,962% |
| Total Debt | 15.3M | N/A | - |
HSTM | LQWDF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 57 | 30 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 56 Fair valued | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 89 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 83 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 87 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HSTM's Valuation (56) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LQWDF (89) in the null industry. This means that HSTM’s stock grew somewhat faster than LQWDF’s over the last 12 months.
HSTM's Profit vs Risk Rating (89) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as LQWDF (100) in the null industry. This means that HSTM’s stock grew similarly to LQWDF’s over the last 12 months.
HSTM's SMR Rating (83) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as LQWDF (95) in the null industry. This means that HSTM’s stock grew similarly to LQWDF’s over the last 12 months.
LQWDF's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as HSTM (81) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that LQWDF’s stock grew similarly to HSTM’s over the last 12 months.
HSTM's P/E Growth Rating (87) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as LQWDF (100) in the null industry. This means that HSTM’s stock grew similarly to LQWDF’s over the last 12 months.
| HSTM | LQWDF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | about 1 month ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | N/A |
Advertisement
HSTM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HSTM has been loosely correlated with OMCL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HSTM jumps, then OMCL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HSTM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HSTM | 100% | -0.45% | ||
| OMCL - HSTM | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.30% | ||
| WEAV - HSTM | 40% Loosely correlated | -3.11% | ||
| PRVA - HSTM | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.87% | ||
| DOCN - HSTM | 38% Loosely correlated | -3.11% | ||
| QTWO - HSTM | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.04% | ||
More | ||||
LQWDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LQWDF has been loosely correlated with BMR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LQWDF jumps, then BMR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LQWDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LQWDF | 100% | +3.58% | ||
| BMR - LQWDF | 35% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| AGYS - LQWDF | 31% Poorly correlated | -2.00% | ||
| TMNSF - LQWDF | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HSTM - LQWDF | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.45% | ||
| WONDF - LQWDF | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.09% | ||
More | ||||