Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSSCX vs RPFGX
HSSCX vs RPFGX Comparison
Open Charts HSSCX vs RPFGX
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd C
Price$24.97
Change-$0.30 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.94M
HSSCX vs RPFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSSCX vs. RPFGX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSSCX is a Buy and RPFGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.13B vs. HSSCX (49.9M). RPFGX pays higher dividends than HSSCX: RPFGX (1.35) vs HSSCX (0.00). HSSCX was incepted earlier than RPFGX: HSSCX (25 years) vs RPFGX (34 years). HSSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). HSSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). RPFGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSSCX: RPFGX (1000) vs HSSCX (2000). RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.80 vs. HSSCX (23.07). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 104.95 vs. HSSCX (21.26).
| HSSCX | RPFGX | HSSCX / RPFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 0.94 | 259% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 0.94 | 259% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.194 | 15.834 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49.9M | 1.13B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.35 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.07 | 26.80 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.38 | 54.72 | 10% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.26 | 104.95 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.77 | 93.45 | -3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement