Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSSCX vs RPFGX
HSSCX vs RPFGX Comparison
Open Charts HSSCX vs RPFGX
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd C
Price$23.92
Change-$0.75 (-3.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets46.62M
HSSCX vs RPFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSSCX vs. RPFGX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSSCX is a Buy and RPFGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.16B vs. HSSCX (46.6M). RPFGX pays higher dividends than HSSCX: RPFGX (1.30) vs HSSCX (0.00). HSSCX was incepted earlier than RPFGX: HSSCX (25 years) vs RPFGX (35 years). HSSCX (2.44) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). HSSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). RPFGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSSCX: RPFGX (1000) vs HSSCX (2000). RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.55 vs. HSSCX (0.73). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 97.57 vs. HSSCX (7.99).
| HSSCX | RPFGX | HSSCX / RPFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.44 | 0.94 | 260% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.44 | 0.94 | 260% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.870 | 22.913 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46.6M | 1.16B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.30 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.73 | 16.55 | 4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.51 | 63.56 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.99 | 97.57 | 8% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.48 | 116.01 | -6% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement