Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSSAX vs RPFGX
HSSAX vs RPFGX Comparison
Open Charts HSSAX vs RPFGX
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd A
Price$29.96
Change-$0.94 (-3.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.03M
HSSAX vs RPFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSSAX vs. RPFGX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSSAX is a Buy and RPFGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.16B vs. HSSAX (48M). RPFGX pays higher dividends than HSSAX: RPFGX (1.30) vs HSSAX (0.00). HSSAX was incepted earlier than RPFGX: HSSAX (29 years) vs RPFGX (35 years). HSSAX (1.79) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). HSSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). HSSAX (5%) and RPFGX (5%) have equivalent initial investment costs. RPFGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSSAX: RPFGX (1000) vs HSSAX (2000). RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.55 vs. HSSAX (-0.89). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 97.57 vs. HSSAX (8.80).
| HSSAX | RPFGX | HSSAX / RPFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 0.94 | 190% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 0.94 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.091 | 22.913 | 27% |
| Front Load | 5% | 5% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48M | 1.16B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.30 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.89 | 16.55 | -5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.13 | 63.56 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.80 | 97.57 | 9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.29 | 116.01 | 0% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement