Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSSAX vs RPFGX
HSSAX vs RPFGX Comparison
Open Charts HSSAX vs RPFGX
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd A
Price$30.88
Change-$0.20 (-0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.76M
HSSAX vs RPFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSSAX vs. RPFGX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSSAX is a Buy and RPFGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.14B vs. HSSAX (49.8M). HSSAX pays higher dividends than RPFGX: HSSAX (1.89) vs RPFGX (1.35). HSSAX was incepted earlier than RPFGX: HSSAX (28 years) vs RPFGX (34 years). HSSAX (1.77) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). HSSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). HSSAX (5%) and RPFGX (5%) have equivalent initial investment costs. RPFGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSSAX: RPFGX (1000) vs HSSAX (2000). RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.74 vs. HSSAX (16.22). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 114.72 vs. HSSAX (35.75).
| HSSAX | RPFGX | HSSAX / RPFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.94 | 188% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.94 | 188% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.348 | 16.523 | 57% |
| Front Load | 5% | 5% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49.8M | 1.14B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.89 | 1.35 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.22 | 26.74 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.98 | 67.10 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.75 | 114.72 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.39 | 96.32 | 10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement