Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSSAX vs RPFGX
HSSAX vs RPFGX Comparison
Open Charts HSSAX vs RPFGX
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd A
Price$32.53
Change-$0.23 (-0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.53M
HSSAX vs RPFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSSAX vs. RPFGX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSSAX is a Hold and RPFGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.23B vs. HSSAX (49.5M). RPFGX pays higher dividends than HSSAX: RPFGX (1.26) vs HSSAX (0.00). HSSAX was incepted earlier than RPFGX: HSSAX (29 years) vs RPFGX (35 years). HSSAX (1.79) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). HSSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). HSSAX (5%) and RPFGX (5%) have equivalent initial investment costs. RPFGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSSAX: RPFGX (1000) vs HSSAX (2000). RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.67 vs. HSSAX (13.23). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 98.65 vs. HSSAX (-6.37).
| HSSAX | RPFGX | HSSAX / RPFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 0.94 | 190% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 0.94 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.191 | 26.233 | 58% |
| Front Load | 5% | 5% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49.5M | 1.23B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.26 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.23 | 24.67 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.58 | 76.44 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.37 | 98.65 | -6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.99 | 122.85 | 8% |