Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSSAX vs RPFGX
HSSAX vs RPFGX Comparison
Open Charts HSSAX vs RPFGX
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd A
Price$31.24
Change-$0.37 (-1.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.94M
HSSAX vs RPFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSSAX vs. RPFGX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSSAX is a Buy and RPFGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.13B vs. HSSAX (49.9M). RPFGX pays higher dividends than HSSAX: RPFGX (1.35) vs HSSAX (0.00). HSSAX was incepted earlier than RPFGX: HSSAX (29 years) vs RPFGX (34 years). HSSAX (1.77) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). HSSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). HSSAX (5%) and RPFGX (5%) have equivalent initial investment costs. RPFGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSSAX: RPFGX (1000) vs HSSAX (2000). RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.80 vs. HSSAX (23.87). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 104.95 vs. HSSAX (26.03).
| HSSAX | RPFGX | HSSAX / RPFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.94 | 188% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.94 | 188% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.623 | 15.834 | 67% |
| Front Load | 5% | 5% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49.9M | 1.13B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.35 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.87 | 26.80 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.48 | 54.72 | 14% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.03 | 104.95 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.42 | 93.45 | 9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement