Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSSAX vs RPFGX
HSSAX vs RPFGX Comparison
Open Charts HSSAX vs RPFGX
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd A
Price$32.82
Change-$0.24 (-0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.82M
HSSAX vs RPFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSSAX vs. RPFGX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSSAX is a Buy and RPFGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.16B vs. HSSAX (51.8M). RPFGX pays higher dividends than HSSAX: RPFGX (1.29) vs HSSAX (0.00). HSSAX was incepted earlier than RPFGX: HSSAX (29 years) vs RPFGX (34 years). HSSAX (1.77) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). HSSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). HSSAX (5%) and RPFGX (5%) have equivalent initial investment costs. RPFGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSSAX: RPFGX (1000) vs HSSAX (2000). HSSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.18 vs. RPFGX (24.90). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 108.48 vs. HSSAX (34.01).
| HSSAX | RPFGX | HSSAX / RPFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.94 | 188% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.94 | 188% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.218 | 18.434 | 88% |
| Front Load | 5% | 5% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.8M | 1.16B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.29 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.18 | 24.90 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.59 | 73.54 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.01 | 108.48 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.45 | 113.13 | 16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement