HSNGF
Price
$15.35
Change
+$1.08 (+7.57%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
28.46B
MZHOF
Price
$32.90
Change
-$0.61 (-1.82%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
84.35B
Interact to see
Advertisement

HSNGF vs MZHOF

Header iconHSNGF vs MZHOF Comparison
Open Charts HSNGF vs MZHOFBanner chart's image
Hang Seng Bank
Price$15.35
Change+$1.08 (+7.57%)
Volume$100
Capitalization28.46B
Mizuho Financial Group
Price$32.90
Change-$0.61 (-1.82%)
Volume$32
Capitalization84.35B
HSNGF vs MZHOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HSNGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MZHOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HSNGF vs. MZHOF commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSNGF is a Hold and MZHOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (HSNGF: $15.35 vs. MZHOF: $32.90)
Brand notoriety: HSNGF and MZHOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HSNGF: 4% vs. MZHOF: 0%
Market capitalization -- HSNGF: $28.46B vs. MZHOF: $84.35B
HSNGF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $28.46B. MZHOF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $84.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $163.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HSNGF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMZHOF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • HSNGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MZHOF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MZHOF is a better buy in the long-term than HSNGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HSNGF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MZHOF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HSNGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MZHOF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HSNGF is a better buy in the short-term than MZHOF.

Price Growth

HSNGF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MZHOF (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MZHOF($84.3B) has a higher market cap than HSNGF($28.5B). HSNGF has higher P/E ratio than MZHOF: HSNGF (15.65) vs MZHOF (13.91). MZHOF YTD gains are higher at: 34.836 vs. HSNGF (26.026). HSNGF has less debt than MZHOF: HSNGF (32.1B) vs MZHOF (22.19T). MZHOF has higher revenues than HSNGF: MZHOF (3.61T) vs HSNGF (42.1B).
HSNGFMZHOFHSNGF / MZHOF
Capitalization28.5B84.3B34%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD26.02634.83675%
P/E Ratio15.6513.91113%
Revenue42.1B3.61T1%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt32.1B22.19T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HSNGF vs MZHOF: Fundamental Ratings
HSNGF
MZHOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10019
SMR RATING
1..100
31
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4845
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1317
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MZHOF's Valuation (73) in the null industry is in the same range as HSNGF (88). This means that MZHOF’s stock grew similarly to HSNGF’s over the last 12 months.

MZHOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HSNGF (100). This means that MZHOF’s stock grew significantly faster than HSNGF’s over the last 12 months.

MZHOF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as HSNGF (3). This means that MZHOF’s stock grew similarly to HSNGF’s over the last 12 months.

MZHOF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as HSNGF (48). This means that MZHOF’s stock grew similarly to HSNGF’s over the last 12 months.

HSNGF's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is in the same range as MZHOF (17). This means that HSNGF’s stock grew similarly to MZHOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HSNGFMZHOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
20%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
31%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HSNGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MZHOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
STAG34.930.41
+1.19%
Stag Industrial
LOCO10.010.10
+1.01%
El Pollo Loco Holdings
MUFG16.040.15
+0.94%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group
BASE24.51N/A
N/A
Couchbase
APWC2.04-0.09
-4.27%
Asia Pacific Wire & Cable Corp Ltd

HSNGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HSNGF and MTPOF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HSNGF and MTPOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HSNGF
1D Price
Change %
HSNGF100%
N/A
MTPOF - HSNGF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MZHOF - HSNGF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JDVB - HSNGF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIBEY - HSNGF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.78%
IBTN - HSNGF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
More

MZHOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MZHOF and HSNGF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MZHOF and HSNGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MZHOF
1D Price
Change %
MZHOF100%
N/A
HSNGF - MZHOF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BNCDY - MZHOF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.10%
CIBEY - MZHOF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.78%
BKHPF - MZHOF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHBAF - MZHOF
22%
Poorly correlated
+34.83%
More