HSNGF
Price
$15.35
Change
+$1.08 (+7.57%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
27.61B
MTPOF
Price
$1.33
Change
+$0.02 (+1.53%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
5.36B
Interact to see
Advertisement

HSNGF vs MTPOF

Header iconHSNGF vs MTPOF Comparison
Open Charts HSNGF vs MTPOFBanner chart's image
Hang Seng Bank
Price$15.35
Change+$1.08 (+7.57%)
Volume$100
Capitalization27.61B
Metropolitan Bank & Trust
Price$1.33
Change+$0.02 (+1.53%)
Volume$334
Capitalization5.36B
HSNGF vs MTPOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HSNGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTPOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HSNGF vs. MTPOF commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSNGF is a StrongBuy and MTPOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (HSNGF: $15.35 vs. MTPOF: $1.33)
Brand notoriety: HSNGF and MTPOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HSNGF: 4% vs. MTPOF: 21%
Market capitalization -- HSNGF: $27.43B vs. MTPOF: $5.46B
HSNGF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $27.43B. MTPOF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $5.46B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HSNGF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMTPOF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HSNGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MTPOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HSNGF is a better buy in the long-term than MTPOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HSNGF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTPOF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HSNGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MTPOF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MTPOF is a better buy in the short-term than HSNGF.

Price Growth

HSNGF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +7.57% price change this week, while MTPOF (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.52%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.34% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSNGF($27.6B) has a higher market cap than MTPOF($5.36B). HSNGF has higher P/E ratio than MTPOF: HSNGF (15.68) vs MTPOF (6.67). HSNGF YTD gains are higher at: 26.026 vs. MTPOF (12.310). HSNGF has less debt than MTPOF: HSNGF (32.1B) vs MTPOF (105B). MTPOF has higher revenues than HSNGF: MTPOF (151B) vs HSNGF (42.1B).
HSNGFMTPOFHSNGF / MTPOF
Capitalization27.6B5.36B515%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD26.02612.310211%
P/E Ratio15.686.67235%
Revenue42.1B151B28%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt32.1B105B31%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HSNGF vs MTPOF: Fundamental Ratings
HSNGF
MTPOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10049
SMR RATING
1..100
31
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4757
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1482
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MTPOF's Valuation (57) in the null industry is in the same range as HSNGF (88). This means that MTPOF’s stock grew similarly to HSNGF’s over the last 12 months.

MTPOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HSNGF (100). This means that MTPOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HSNGF’s over the last 12 months.

MTPOF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as HSNGF (3). This means that MTPOF’s stock grew similarly to HSNGF’s over the last 12 months.

HSNGF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as MTPOF (57). This means that HSNGF’s stock grew similarly to MTPOF’s over the last 12 months.

HSNGF's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MTPOF (82). This means that HSNGF’s stock grew significantly faster than MTPOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HSNGFMTPOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
14%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
23%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
28%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
23%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
21%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
8%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HSNGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTPOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RING56.941.72
+3.11%
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF
TBFG28.890.07
+0.24%
The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF
BCUS32.290.01
+0.02%
BANCREEK U.S. Large Cap ETF
FFLV22.98-0.09
-0.39%
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF
HOOG60.57-1.89
-3.03%
Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF

HSNGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HSNGF and MTPOF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HSNGF and MTPOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HSNGF
1D Price
Change %
HSNGF100%
N/A
MTPOF - HSNGF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.60%
MZHOF - HSNGF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JDVB - HSNGF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIBEY - HSNGF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.59%
IBTN - HSNGF
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.01%
More

MTPOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTPOF has been loosely correlated with SBGOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MTPOF jumps, then SBGOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTPOF
1D Price
Change %
MTPOF100%
+1.60%
SBGOF - MTPOF
52%
Loosely correlated
+2.45%
HSNGF - MTPOF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIHHF - MTPOF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RSNHF - MTPOF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PBNNF - MTPOF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More