HSNGF
Price
$14.98
Change
+$0.45 (+3.10%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
28.37B
JDVB
Price
$26.00
Change
+$0.65 (+2.56%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
96.6M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HSNGF vs JDVB

Header iconHSNGF vs JDVB Comparison
Open Charts HSNGF vs JDVBBanner chart's image
Hang Seng Bank
Price$14.98
Change+$0.45 (+3.10%)
Volume$100
Capitalization28.37B
JD Bancshares
Price$26.00
Change+$0.65 (+2.56%)
Volume$300
Capitalization96.6M
HSNGF vs JDVB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HSNGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JDVB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HSNGF vs. JDVB commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSNGF is a Buy and JDVB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (HSNGF: $14.98 vs. JDVB: $26.00)
Brand notoriety: HSNGF and JDVB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HSNGF: 6% vs. JDVB: 20%
Market capitalization -- HSNGF: $28.37B vs. JDVB: $96.6M
HSNGF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $28.37B. JDVB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $96.6M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HSNGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileJDVB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HSNGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • JDVB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HSNGF is a better buy in the long-term than JDVB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HSNGF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JDVB’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HSNGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • JDVB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HSNGF is a better buy in the short-term than JDVB.

Price Growth

HSNGF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while JDVB (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSNGF($28.4B) has a higher market cap than JDVB($96.6M). HSNGF has higher P/E ratio than JDVB: HSNGF (23.26) vs JDVB (7.94). HSNGF YTD gains are higher at: 22.997 vs. JDVB (8.633). JDVB has less debt than HSNGF: JDVB (59.8M) vs HSNGF (28.9B). HSNGF has higher revenues than JDVB: HSNGF (53.2B) vs JDVB (54.5M).
HSNGFJDVBHSNGF / JDVB
Capitalization28.4B96.6M29,400%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD22.9978.633266%
P/E Ratio23.267.94293%
Revenue53.2B54.5M97,615%
Total CashN/A27M-
Total Debt28.9B59.8M48,328%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HSNGF vs JDVB: Fundamental Ratings
HSNGF
JDVB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10079
SMR RATING
1..100
245
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4851
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4382
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

JDVB's Valuation (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HSNGF (79). This means that JDVB’s stock grew somewhat faster than HSNGF’s over the last 12 months.

JDVB's Profit vs Risk Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as HSNGF (100). This means that JDVB’s stock grew similarly to HSNGF’s over the last 12 months.

HSNGF's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JDVB (45). This means that HSNGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than JDVB’s over the last 12 months.

HSNGF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as JDVB (51). This means that HSNGF’s stock grew similarly to JDVB’s over the last 12 months.

HSNGF's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JDVB (82). This means that HSNGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than JDVB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HSNGFJDVB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
14%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
23%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
24%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HSNGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JDVB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OST0.170.04
+27.69%
Ostin Technology Group Co Ltd
HAO1.400.14
+11.41%
Haoxi Health Technology Limited
CSW293.003.69
+1.28%
CSW Industrials Inc
PRSU31.080.33
+1.07%
Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality Inc
XEL68.190.63
+0.93%
Xcel Energy

HSNGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HSNGF and MTPOF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HSNGF and MTPOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HSNGF
1D Price
Change %
HSNGF100%
N/A
MTPOF - HSNGF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MZHOF - HSNGF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JDVB - HSNGF
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.56%
CIBEY - HSNGF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
IBTN - HSNGF
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.66%
More

JDVB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JDVB and HSNGF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JDVB and HSNGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JDVB
1D Price
Change %
JDVB100%
+2.56%
HSNGF - JDVB
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TRVR - JDVB
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TFIN - JDVB
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.40%
JFBC - JDVB
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
ISBA - JDVB
6%
Poorly correlated
-7.48%
More