Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSMSX vs SSGSX
HSMSX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HSMSX vs SSGSX
Hartford Small Cap Value R4
Price$13.89
Change+$0.57 (+4.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets235.12M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$48.32
Change+$1.94 (+4.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.04B
HSMSX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSMSX vs. SSGSX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSMSX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.04B vs. HSMSX (235M). HSMSX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HSMSX (0.87) vs SSGSX (0.58). HSMSX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HSMSX (14 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). HSMSX (1.31) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.23). HSMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. SSGSX (50.00). HSMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: HSMSX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). HSMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.41 vs. SSGSX (3.83). HSMSX return over 5 years is better than : 20.63 vs. SSGSX (-0.23).
| HSMSX | SSGSX | HSMSX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.23 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.23 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.437 | 8.123 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 235M | 5.04B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.87 | 0.58 | 152% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.41 | 3.83 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.12 | -3.10 | -455% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.63 | -0.23 | -9,111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.49 | 53.01 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement