Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSLTX vs WCMNX
HSLTX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts HSLTX vs WCMNX
Hartford Small Cap Growth R5
Price$51.15
Change+$0.84 (+1.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets303.74M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.85
Change+$0.20 (+1.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.36M
HSLTX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLTX vs. WCMNX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLTX is a Buy and WCMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLTX has more cash in the bank: 304M vs. WCMNX (44.4M). HSLTX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: HSLTX (1.20) vs WCMNX (0.00). HSLTX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: HSLTX (19 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than HSLTX (0.97). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. HSLTX (68.00). HSLTX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMNX: HSLTX (0) vs WCMNX (1000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.65 vs. HSLTX (-10.41). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 0.44 vs. HSLTX (-23.91).
| HSLTX | WCMNX | HSLTX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.24 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 2.04 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.484 | 9.141 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 304M | 44.4M | 685% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.41 | 0.65 | -1,591% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.44 | 22.89 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.91 | 0.44 | -5,494% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.70 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement