Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSLSX vs WCMNX
HSLSX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts HSLSX vs WCMNX
Hartford Small Cap Growth R4
Price$45.80
Change+$0.75 (+1.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets303.74M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.65
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.69M
HSLSX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLSX vs. WCMNX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLSX is a Buy and WCMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLSX has more cash in the bank: 304M vs. WCMNX (43.7M). HSLSX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: HSLSX (1.08) vs WCMNX (0.00). HSLSX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: HSLSX (19 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than HSLSX (1.27). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. HSLSX (68.00). HSLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMNX: HSLSX (0) vs WCMNX (1000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.37 vs. HSLSX (-13.44). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 0.74 vs. HSLSX (-27.51).
| HSLSX | WCMNX | HSLSX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.24 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 2.04 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.411 | 7.486 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 304M | 43.7M | 696% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.44 | -1.37 | 978% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.77 | 21.03 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | -27.51 | 0.74 | -3,725% |
| Returns for 10 years | -11.09 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement