Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSLSX vs WCMLX
HSLSX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts HSLSX vs WCMLX
Hartford Small Cap Growth R4
Price$45.80
Change+$0.75 (+1.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets303.74M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.06
Change+$0.20 (+1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.36M
HSLSX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLSX vs. WCMLX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLSX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLSX has more cash in the bank: 304M vs. WCMLX (44.4M). HSLSX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: HSLSX (1.08) vs WCMLX (0.00). HSLSX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: HSLSX (19 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than HSLSX (1.27). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. HSLSX (68.00). HSLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: HSLSX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.14 vs. HSLSX (-13.44). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 1.99 vs. HSLSX (-27.51).
| HSLSX | WCMLX | HSLSX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.99 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.79 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.411 | 7.621 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 304M | 44.4M | 685% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.44 | -1.14 | 1,176% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.77 | 21.83 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | -27.51 | 1.99 | -1,383% |
| Returns for 10 years | -11.09 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement