Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSLRX vs WCMNX
HSLRX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts HSLRX vs WCMNX
Hartford Small Cap Growth R3
Price$40.28
Change+$0.07 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets298.63M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.65
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.69M
HSLRX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLRX vs. WCMNX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLRX is a Buy and WCMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLRX has more cash in the bank: 299M vs. WCMNX (43.7M). HSLRX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: HSLRX (0.94) vs WCMNX (0.00). HSLRX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: HSLRX (19 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than HSLRX (1.58). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. HSLRX (68.00). HSLRX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMNX: HSLRX (0) vs WCMNX (1000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.37 vs. HSLRX (-14.82). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 0.74 vs. HSLRX (-31.23).
| HSLRX | WCMNX | HSLRX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 1.24 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 2.04 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.123 | 7.486 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 299M | 43.7M | 684% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.82 | -1.37 | 1,079% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.96 | 21.03 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.23 | 0.74 | -4,228% |
| Returns for 10 years | -18.42 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement