Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSLRX vs WCMLX
HSLRX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts HSLRX vs WCMLX
Hartford Small Cap Growth R3
Price$40.28
Change+$0.07 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets298.63M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.06
Change+$0.20 (+1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.36M
HSLRX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLRX vs. WCMLX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLRX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLRX has more cash in the bank: 299M vs. WCMLX (44.4M). HSLRX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: HSLRX (0.94) vs WCMLX (0.00). HSLRX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: HSLRX (19 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than HSLRX (1.58). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. HSLRX (68.00). HSLRX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: HSLRX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.14 vs. HSLRX (-14.82). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 1.99 vs. HSLRX (-31.23).
| HSLRX | WCMLX | HSLRX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 0.99 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 1.79 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.123 | 7.621 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 299M | 44.4M | 673% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.82 | -1.14 | 1,297% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.96 | 21.83 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.23 | 1.99 | -1,569% |
| Returns for 10 years | -18.42 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers