Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSLFX vs WCMNX
HSLFX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts HSLFX vs WCMNX
Hartford Small Cap Growth F
Price$47.94
Change+$0.78 (+1.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets303.74M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.85
Change+$0.20 (+1.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.36M
HSLFX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLFX vs. WCMNX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLFX is a Buy and WCMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLFX has more cash in the bank: 304M vs. WCMNX (44.4M). HSLFX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: HSLFX (1.36) vs WCMNX (0.00). HSLFX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: HSLFX (9 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than HSLFX (0.86). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. HSLFX (68.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSLFX: WCMNX (1000) vs HSLFX (1000000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.37 vs. HSLFX (-12.65). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 0.74 vs. HSLFX (-25.08).
| HSLFX | WCMNX | HSLFX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.24 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 2.04 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.830 | 7.486 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 304M | 44.4M | 685% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.65 | -1.37 | 921% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.86 | 21.03 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | -25.08 | 0.74 | -3,396% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement