Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSLFX vs WCMNX
HSLFX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts HSLFX vs WCMNX
Hartford Small Cap Growth F
Price$46.01
Change-$0.37 (-0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets292.73M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$14.42
Change+$0.82 (+6.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.08M
HSLFX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLFX vs. WCMNX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLFX is a Hold and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLFX has more cash in the bank: 293M vs. WCMNX (47.1M). HSLFX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . HSLFX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: HSLFX (9 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than HSLFX (0.86). HSLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. WCMNX (83.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSLFX: WCMNX (1000) vs HSLFX (1000000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.34 vs. HSLFX (1.86). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : -6.49 vs. HSLFX (-32.55).
| HSLFX | WCMNX | HSLFX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.24 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 2.04 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.382 | 6.421 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 293M | 47.1M | 622% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.86 | 8.34 | 22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.48 | 18.68 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | -32.55 | -6.49 | 502% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement