Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSLFX vs WCMLX
HSLFX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts HSLFX vs WCMLX
Hartford Small Cap Growth F
Price$45.23
Change-$1.80 (-3.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets289.14M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.25
Change-$0.44 (-3.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.88M
HSLFX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLFX vs. WCMLX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLFX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLFX has more cash in the bank: 289M vs. WCMLX (41.9M). HSLFX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: HSLFX (1.37) vs WCMLX (0.00). HSLFX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: HSLFX (9 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than HSLFX (0.86). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. HSLFX (68.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSLFX: WCMLX (100000) vs HSLFX (1000000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.98 vs. HSLFX (-11.04). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 4.74 vs. HSLFX (-21.87).
| HSLFX | WCMLX | HSLFX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.99 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.79 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.717 | 6.454 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 289M | 41.9M | 690% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.04 | -2.98 | 371% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.55 | 22.89 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.87 | 4.74 | -461% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement