Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSLFX vs WCMLX
HSLFX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts HSLFX vs WCMLX
Hartford Small Cap Growth F
Price$47.94
Change+$0.78 (+1.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets303.74M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.06
Change+$0.20 (+1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.36M
HSLFX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLFX vs. WCMLX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLFX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLFX has more cash in the bank: 304M vs. WCMLX (44.4M). HSLFX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: HSLFX (1.36) vs WCMLX (0.00). HSLFX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: HSLFX (9 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than HSLFX (0.86). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. HSLFX (68.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSLFX: WCMLX (100000) vs HSLFX (1000000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.14 vs. HSLFX (-12.65). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 1.99 vs. HSLFX (-25.08).
| HSLFX | WCMLX | HSLFX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.99 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.79 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.830 | 7.621 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 304M | 44.4M | 685% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.65 | -1.14 | 1,107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.86 | 21.83 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | -25.08 | 1.99 | -1,261% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers