Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSLCX vs WCMNX
HSLCX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts HSLCX vs WCMNX
Hartford Small Cap Growth C
Price$41.09
Change+$0.08 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets297.35M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.86
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.65M
HSLCX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLCX vs. WCMNX commentary
Dec 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLCX is a StrongBuy and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLCX has more cash in the bank: 297M vs. WCMNX (44.7M). HSLCX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: HSLCX (0.42) vs WCMNX (0.00). HSLCX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: HSLCX (24 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). HSLCX (2.10) and WCMNX (2.04) have similar cost to investors . WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. HSLCX (68.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSLCX: WCMNX (1000) vs HSLCX (2000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.86 vs. HSLCX (-2.22). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : -5.26 vs. HSLCX (-48.15).
| HSLCX | WCMNX | HSLCX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.24 | 169% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 2.04 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.460 | 9.220 | -5% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 297M | 44.7M | 664% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.22 | 7.86 | -28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.70 | 32.00 | 21% |
| Returns for 5 years | -48.15 | -5.26 | 915% |
| Returns for 10 years | -41.01 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement