Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSLCX vs WCMLX
HSLCX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts HSLCX vs WCMLX
Hartford Small Cap Growth C
Price$43.02
Change-$0.04 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets292.73M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.81
Change-$0.14 (-1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets46.63M
HSLCX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLCX vs. WCMLX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLCX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLCX has more cash in the bank: 293M vs. WCMLX (46.6M). HSLCX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . HSLCX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: HSLCX (24 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). HSLCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than WCMLX (1.79). HSLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). HSLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: HSLCX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.58 vs. HSLCX (-0.96). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -4.02 vs. HSLCX (-47.75).
| HSLCX | WCMLX | HSLCX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.99 | 212% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.79 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.459 | 5.887 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 293M | 46.6M | 629% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.96 | 6.58 | -15% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.39 | 18.94 | -7% |
| Returns for 5 years | -47.75 | -4.02 | 1,188% |
| Returns for 10 years | -27.42 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement