Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSLCX vs WCMLX
HSLCX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts HSLCX vs WCMLX
Hartford Small Cap Growth C
Price$43.57
Change-$0.13 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets301.82M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.69
Change+$0.06 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.06M
HSLCX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLCX vs. WCMLX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLCX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLCX has more cash in the bank: 302M vs. WCMLX (43.1M). HSLCX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: HSLCX (0.42) vs WCMLX (0.00). HSLCX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: HSLCX (24 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). HSLCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than WCMLX (1.79). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. HSLCX (68.00). HSLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: HSLCX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.98 vs. HSLCX (-12.88). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 4.74 vs. HSLCX (-42.99).
| HSLCX | WCMLX | HSLCX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.99 | 212% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.79 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.547 | 6.454 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 302M | 43.1M | 701% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.88 | -2.98 | 433% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.48 | 22.89 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | -42.99 | 4.74 | -906% |
| Returns for 10 years | -42.93 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers