Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSLCX vs WCMLX
HSLCX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts HSLCX vs WCMLX
Hartford Small Cap Growth C
Price$43.66
Change+$0.08 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets298.63M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.06
Change+$0.20 (+1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.36M
HSLCX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLCX vs. WCMLX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLCX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLCX has more cash in the bank: 299M vs. WCMLX (44.4M). HSLCX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: HSLCX (0.42) vs WCMLX (0.00). HSLCX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: HSLCX (24 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). HSLCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than WCMLX (1.79). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. HSLCX (68.00). HSLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: HSLCX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.14 vs. HSLCX (-14.48). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 1.99 vs. HSLCX (-45.36).
| HSLCX | WCMLX | HSLCX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.99 | 212% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.79 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.572 | 7.621 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 299M | 44.4M | 673% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.48 | -1.14 | 1,267% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.93 | 21.83 | 23% |
| Returns for 5 years | -45.36 | 1.99 | -2,280% |
| Returns for 10 years | -45.35 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement