Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSLAX vs WCMNX
HSLAX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts HSLAX vs WCMNX
Hartford Small Cap Growth A
Price$40.51
Change-$0.80 (-1.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets292.73M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$14.42
Change+$0.82 (+6.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.08M
HSLAX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLAX vs. WCMNX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLAX is a Hold and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLAX has more cash in the bank: 293M vs. WCMNX (47.1M). HSLAX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . HSLAX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: HSLAX (24 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than HSLAX (1.33). HSLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. WCMNX (83.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSLAX: WCMNX (1000) vs HSLAX (2000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.34 vs. HSLAX (0.37). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : -6.49 vs. HSLAX (-36.81).
| HSLAX | WCMNX | HSLAX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.24 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 2.04 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.330 | 6.421 | 83% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 293M | 47.1M | 622% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.37 | 8.34 | 4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.24 | 18.68 | 17% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.81 | -6.49 | 568% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.99 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement