Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSLAX vs WCMNX
HSLAX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts HSLAX vs WCMNX
Hartford Small Cap Growth A
Price$40.26
Change-$1.60 (-3.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets289.14M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.05
Change-$0.44 (-3.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.88M
HSLAX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLAX vs. WCMNX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLAX is a Hold and WCMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLAX has more cash in the bank: 289M vs. WCMNX (41.9M). HSLAX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: HSLAX (1.14) vs WCMNX (0.00). HSLAX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: HSLAX (24 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than HSLAX (1.33). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. HSLAX (68.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSLAX: WCMNX (1000) vs HSLAX (2000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.16 vs. HSLAX (-12.63). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 3.45 vs. HSLAX (-26.39).
| HSLAX | WCMNX | HSLAX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.24 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 2.04 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.244 | 6.304 | 99% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 289M | 41.9M | 690% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.63 | -3.16 | 400% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.10 | 22.08 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | -26.39 | 3.45 | -765% |
| Returns for 10 years | -11.11 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement