Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSLAX vs WCMLX
HSLAX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts HSLAX vs WCMLX
Hartford Small Cap Growth A
Price$42.66
Change+$0.70 (+1.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets303.74M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.06
Change+$0.20 (+1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.36M
HSLAX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLAX vs. WCMLX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLAX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLAX has more cash in the bank: 304M vs. WCMLX (44.4M). HSLAX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: HSLAX (1.13) vs WCMLX (0.00). HSLAX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: HSLAX (24 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than HSLAX (1.33). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. HSLAX (68.00). HSLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: HSLAX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.86 vs. HSLAX (-12.38). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 1.74 vs. HSLAX (-29.44).
| HSLAX | WCMLX | HSLAX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 0.99 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.79 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.274 | 9.331 | 89% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 304M | 44.4M | 685% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.38 | 0.86 | -1,438% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.46 | 23.77 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | -29.44 | 1.74 | -1,695% |
| Returns for 10 years | -13.31 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers