Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSLAX vs WCMLX
HSLAX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts HSLAX vs WCMLX
Hartford Small Cap Growth A
Price$40.51
Change-$0.80 (-1.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets292.73M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.64
Change+$0.83 (+6.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.08M
HSLAX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLAX vs. WCMLX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLAX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLAX has more cash in the bank: 293M vs. WCMLX (47.1M). HSLAX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . HSLAX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: HSLAX (24 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than HSLAX (1.33). HSLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). HSLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: HSLAX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.52 vs. HSLAX (0.37). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -5.30 vs. HSLAX (-36.81).
| HSLAX | WCMLX | HSLAX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 0.99 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.79 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.330 | 6.395 | 83% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 293M | 47.1M | 622% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.37 | 8.52 | 4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.24 | 19.51 | 17% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.81 | -5.30 | 694% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.99 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement