Advertisement
HSII vs MHH
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSII is a Hold and MHH is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HSII’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMHH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- HSII’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MHH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HSII’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MHH’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HSII’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MHH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
HSII (@Personnel Services) experienced а +10.12% price change this week, while MHH (@Personnel Services) price change was +3.09% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Personnel Services industry was +7.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.30%.
Reported Earning Dates
HSII is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2025.
MHH is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Personnel Services (+7.26% weekly)Personnel Services comprise companies that provide staffing and human resources management solutions for businesses. Each company might be involved in one or more types of recruitment or employee solutions such as permanent or temporary staffing, career consulting, outsourcing, administrative services and many more. Some personnel services companies cater to large businesses, while some specialize in providing services to small/medium-sized organizations. These specialized services potentially expedite the process of getting the ‘right’ candidates and/or training them to meet the requirements of a business process. Some of the companies also cover other critical areas like internal auditing for a company. Robert Half International Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc. and Insperity, Inc. are examples of companies in the personnel services industry.
| HSII | MHH | HSII / MHH | |
| Capitalization | 656M | 105M | 625% |
| EBITDA | 101M | 2.98M | 3,389% |
| Gain YTD | 10.266 | -52.953 | -19% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.45 | 53.19 | 23% |
| Revenue | 1.04B | 201M | 518% |
| Total Cash | 478M | 21.1M | 2,265% |
| Total Debt | 99.7M | 5.08M | 1,963% |
HSII | MHH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 90 Overvalued | 81 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 37 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 88 | 87 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 63 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 11 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MHH's Valuation (81) in the Personnel Services industry is in the same range as HSII (90). This means that MHH’s stock grew similarly to HSII’s over the last 12 months.
HSII's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Personnel Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MHH (100). This means that HSII’s stock grew somewhat faster than MHH’s over the last 12 months.
MHH's SMR Rating (87) in the Personnel Services industry is in the same range as HSII (88). This means that MHH’s stock grew similarly to HSII’s over the last 12 months.
HSII's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Personnel Services industry is in the same range as MHH (64). This means that HSII’s stock grew similarly to MHH’s over the last 12 months.
HSII's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Personnel Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MHH (63). This means that HSII’s stock grew somewhat faster than MHH’s over the last 12 months.
| HSII | MHH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 7 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 88% |
Advertisement
HSII and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HSII has been closely correlated with KFY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HSII jumps, then KFY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HSII | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HSII | 100% | +2.32% | ||
| KFY - HSII | 67% Closely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| BBSI - HSII | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.90% | ||
| RHI - HSII | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| KELYA - HSII | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| MAN - HSII | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.55% | ||
More | ||||
MHH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MHH and BBSI have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MHH and BBSI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MHH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MHH | 100% | -0.43% | ||
| BBSI - MHH | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.90% | ||
| RHI - MHH | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.42% | ||
| NSP - MHH | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HSII - MHH | 15% Poorly correlated | +2.32% | ||
| KFY - MHH | 13% Poorly correlated | -0.24% | ||
More | ||||