It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HSIC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HSIC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
HSIC (@Medical Distributors) experienced а +2.88% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Distributors industry was +0.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.97%.
HSIC is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.
Healthcare distribution market can be segmented into pharmaceutical product distribution services, medical device distribution services, and biopharmaceutical product distribution services. In addition to serving as intermediaries, many medical distributors also purchase and take legal ownership of pharmaceuticals and manage inventory and credit risk. According to a Deloitte report, pharmaceutical distributors’ core services of efficient product distribution, inventory management, financial risk management, and information-sharing generate $33 billion-$53 billion in value annually to the U.S. health care ecosystem. Some prominent players in the overall medical distribution industry include McKesson Corporation, AmerisourceBergen Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc. and Patterson Companies, Inc.
HSIC | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 74 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 94 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 72 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HSIC | TPLE | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago56% | 7 days ago80% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago57% | 4 days ago65% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago57% | 4 days ago67% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago53% | 4 days ago69% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago53% | 4 days ago76% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago53% | 4 days ago69% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago52% | 5 days ago75% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago55% | 17 days ago72% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago57% | 4 days ago67% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago47% | 4 days ago72% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that HSIC and ZYXI have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HSIC and ZYXI's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HSIC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HSIC | 100% | -0.10% | ||
ZYXI - HSIC | 30% Poorly correlated | -4.40% | ||
OMI - HSIC | 22% Poorly correlated | +5.19% | ||
COSM - HSIC | 13% Poorly correlated | +1.20% | ||
CAH - HSIC | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.41% | ||
COR - HSIC | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.51% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that TPLE and REGN have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TPLE and REGN's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TPLE | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
TPLE | 100% | N/A | ||
REGN - TPLE | 17% Poorly correlated | +2.55% | ||
DVA - TPLE | 16% Poorly correlated | +0.74% | ||
SAIA - TPLE | 15% Poorly correlated | -1.92% | ||
ODFL - TPLE | 15% Poorly correlated | +0.02% | ||
HSIC - TPLE | 14% Poorly correlated | -0.10% | ||
More |