Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSGFX vs QLENX
HSGFX vs QLENX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSGFX vs. QLENX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSGFX is a Buy and QLENX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLENX has more cash in the bank: 8.07B vs. HSGFX (346M). HSGFX pays higher dividends than QLENX: HSGFX (2.37) vs QLENX (1.66). HSGFX was incepted earlier than QLENX: HSGFX (26 years) vs QLENX (13 years). QLENX (5.59) is less costly to investors than HSGFX (1.26). HSGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 470.00 vs. QLENX (362.00). HSGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QLENX: HSGFX (1000) vs QLENX (2500). QLENX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.48 vs. HSGFX (2.51). QLENX return over 5 years is better than : 205.15 vs. HSGFX (-6.24).
| HSGFX | QLENX | HSGFX / QLENX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 5.58 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 5.59 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.582 | -1.070 | 148% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 346M | 8.07B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.37 | 1.66 | 143% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.51 | 27.48 | 9% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.15 | 108.06 | -10% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.24 | 205.15 | -3% |
| Returns for 10 years | -25.53 | 167.57 | -15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement