Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSEIX vs WCMFX
HSEIX vs WCMFX Comparison
Open Charts HSEIX vs WCMFX
Hartford Small Cap Value I
Price$12.75
Change+$0.22 (+1.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets194.26M
WCM SMID Quality Val Fd Institutional
Price$3.55
Change+$0.01 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.61M
HSEIX vs WCMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSEIX vs. WCMFX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSEIX is a StrongBuy and WCMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSEIX has more cash in the bank: 194M vs. WCMFX (2.61M). HSEIX pays higher dividends than WCMFX: HSEIX (1.64) vs WCMFX (0.00). HSEIX was incepted earlier than WCMFX: HSEIX (11 years) vs WCMFX (6 years). WCMFX (1.45) is less costly to investors than HSEIX (1.03). HSEIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. WCMFX (15.00). HSEIX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMFX: HSEIX (2000) vs WCMFX (100000). HSEIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.91 vs. WCMFX (-76.13). HSEIX return over 5 years is better than : 30.08 vs. WCMFX (-64.64).
| HSEIX | WCMFX | HSEIX / WCMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.90 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.45 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.181 | -70.451 | 2% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 194M | 2.61M | 7,427% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.64 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.91 | -76.13 | 14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.66 | -66.82 | -14% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.08 | -64.64 | -47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.56 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers