Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSEIX vs SSGSX
HSEIX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HSEIX vs SSGSX
Hartford Small Cap Value I
Price$12.92
Change+$0.46 (+3.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets235.12M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$48.32
Change+$1.94 (+4.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.04B
HSEIX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSEIX vs. SSGSX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSEIX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.04B vs. HSEIX (235M). HSEIX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HSEIX (1.13) vs SSGSX (0.58). HSEIX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HSEIX (11 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.23) is less costly to investors than HSEIX (1.03). HSEIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. SSGSX (50.00). HSEIX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: HSEIX (2000) vs SSGSX (2500). HSEIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.22 vs. SSGSX (3.83). HSEIX return over 5 years is better than : 20.08 vs. SSGSX (-0.23).
| HSEIX | SSGSX | HSEIX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.23 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.23 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.425 | 8.123 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 235M | 5.04B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 0.58 | 196% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.22 | 3.83 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.02 | -3.10 | -452% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.08 | -0.23 | -8,871% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.85 | 53.01 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement