HRSEF
Price
$116.47
Change
+$10.66 (+10.07%)
Updated
Jul 9 closing price
Capitalization
4.26B
KGBLY
Price
$15.31
Change
-$15.30 (-49.98%)
Updated
Apr 22 closing price
Capitalization
4.64B
Interact to see
Advertisement

HRSEF vs KGBLY

Header iconHRSEF vs KGBLY Comparison
Open Charts HRSEF vs KGBLYBanner chart's image
Hirose Electric
Price$116.47
Change+$10.66 (+10.07%)
Volume$100
Capitalization4.26B
Kingboard Laminates Holdings
Price$15.31
Change-$15.30 (-49.98%)
Volume$2.79K
Capitalization4.64B
HRSEF vs KGBLY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
KGBLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HRSEF vs. KGBLY commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HRSEF is a Hold and KGBLY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (HRSEF: $116.47 vs. KGBLY: $11.17)
Brand notoriety: HRSEF and KGBLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HRSEF: 100% vs. KGBLY: 100%
Market capitalization -- HRSEF: $4.26B vs. KGBLY: $4.64B
HRSEF [@Electronic Components] is valued at $4.26B. KGBLY’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $4.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $149.68B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $8.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HRSEF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileKGBLY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HRSEF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • KGBLY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HRSEF is a better buy in the long-term than KGBLY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KGBLY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • KGBLY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.

Price Growth

HRSEF (@Electronic Components) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while KGBLY (@Electronic Components) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +1.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.27%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (+1.23% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KGBLY($4.64B) has a higher market cap than HRSEF($4.26B). HRSEF has higher P/E ratio than KGBLY: HRSEF (17.75) vs KGBLY (11.31). HRSEF YTD gains are higher at: 10.075 vs. KGBLY (-19.378).
HRSEFKGBLYHRSEF / KGBLY
Capitalization4.26B4.64B92%
EBITDA61.1BN/A-
Gain YTD10.075-19.378-52%
P/E Ratio17.7511.31157%
Revenue177BN/A-
Total Cash159BN/A-
Total Debt5.65BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HRSEF: Fundamental Ratings
HRSEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
89
SMR RATING
1..100
8
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HRSEFKGBLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
9%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
28%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
10%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
26%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KGBLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IYG89.790.52
+0.58%
iShares US Financial Services ETF
GDO11.910.06
+0.51%
Western Asset Global Corporate Opportunity Fund Inc
MLPD25.880.09
+0.36%
Global X MLP & Engy Infras Cov Cll ETF
MINO45.190.01
+0.02%
PIMCO Muncpl Income Oppos Act Ex-Trd
ARKD59.29N/A
N/A
ARK 21Shares Digital Ass And Blc Str ETF

HRSEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HRSEF and KULR have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HRSEF and KULR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HRSEF
1D Price
Change %
HRSEF100%
N/A
KULR - HRSEF
4%
Poorly correlated
-2.52%
MNBEF - HRSEF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JNPKF - HRSEF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IEHC - HRSEF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KGBLY - HRSEF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

KGBLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KGBLY and IEHC have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KGBLY and IEHC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KGBLY
1D Price
Change %
KGBLY100%
N/A
IEHC - KGBLY
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JNPKF - KGBLY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNBEF - KGBLY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IACYF - KGBLY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IBIDF - KGBLY
-0%
Poorly correlated
-7.26%
More