Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HRLCX vs RIDAX
HRLCX vs RIDAX Comparison
Open Charts HRLCX vs RIDAX
Hartford Real Asset C
Price$9.05
Change-$0.01 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets61.59M
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R1
Price$26.67
Change+$0.08 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.54B
HRLCX vs RIDAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HRLCX vs. RIDAX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HRLCX is a Buy and RIDAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIDAX has more cash in the bank: 136B vs. HRLCX (61.6M). RIDAX pays higher dividends than HRLCX: RIDAX (2.97) vs HRLCX (2.64). HRLCX was incepted earlier than RIDAX: HRLCX (15 years) vs RIDAX (23 years). HRLCX (2.33) is less costly to investors than RIDAX (1.36). HRLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 198.00 vs. RIDAX (92.00). RIDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HRLCX: RIDAX (250) vs HRLCX (2000). RIDAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.33 vs. HRLCX (7.86). HRLCX return over 5 years is better than : 50.58 vs. RIDAX (40.27).
| HRLCX | RIDAX | HRLCX / RIDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 1.36 | 148% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.33 | 1.36 | 171% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.984 | 11.068 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 61.6M | 136B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.64 | 2.97 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.86 | 14.33 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.78 | 24.49 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.58 | 40.27 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.90 | 43.99 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement