HQY
Price
$96.53
Change
+$0.37 (+0.38%)
Updated
Sep 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.28B
74 days until earnings call
UBSFF
Price
$11.49
Change
+$0.28 (+2.50%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.53B
Interact to see
Advertisement

HQY vs UBSFF

Header iconHQY vs UBSFF Comparison
Open Charts HQY vs UBSFFBanner chart's image
HealthEquity
Price$96.53
Change+$0.37 (+0.38%)
Volume$10.67K
Capitalization8.28B
UbiSoft Entertainment
Price$11.49
Change+$0.28 (+2.50%)
Volume$231
Capitalization1.53B
HQY vs UBSFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HQY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UBSFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HQY vs. UBSFF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HQY is a Buy and UBSFF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (HQY: $96.53 vs. UBSFF: $11.49)
Brand notoriety: HQY and UBSFF are both not notable
HQY represents the Services to the Health Industry, while UBSFF is part of the Electronics/Appliances industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HQY: 34% vs. UBSFF: 52%
Market capitalization -- HQY: $8.28B vs. UBSFF: $1.53B
HQY [@Services to the Health Industry] is valued at $8.28B. UBSFF’s [@Electronics/Appliances] market capitalization is $1.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry ranges from $45.88B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronics/Appliances] industry ranges from $403.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry is $2.27B. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronics/Appliances] industry is $12.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HQY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUBSFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HQY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UBSFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HQY is a better buy in the long-term than UBSFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HQY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UBSFF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HQY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UBSFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HQY is a better buy in the short-term than UBSFF.

Price Growth

HQY (@Services to the Health Industry) experienced а +2.98% price change this week, while UBSFF (@Electronics/Appliances) price change was +12.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was +1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.02%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliances industry was +6.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

HQY is expected to report earnings on Dec 09, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Services to the Health Industry (+1.09% weekly)

This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.

@Electronics/Appliances (+6.98% weekly)

TVs, telephones, washing machines, home speakers and even home-office equipment like computers and printers…the list is virtually endless when it comes to consumer electronics and appliances. And, with ‘smarthomes’ increasingly becoming the reality, we could see a sharp surge in high-tech gadgets (including robotic appliances) making their way into our homes– and therefore spelling plenty opportunities in the related industries. Consumers account for 70% of US GDP, and their purchases of high-functioning electronics could make significant dents in the economy’s health. Sony Corp., Whirlpool and iRobot are some of the major consumer electronics/appliances makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HQY($8.29B) has a higher market cap than UBSFF($1.53B). HQY has higher P/E ratio than UBSFF: HQY (58.28) vs UBSFF (8.69). HQY YTD gains are higher at: 0.219 vs. UBSFF (-14.061). UBSFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 888M vs. HQY (406M). UBSFF has more cash in the bank: 933M vs. HQY (304M). HQY has less debt than UBSFF: HQY (1.06B) vs UBSFF (2.34B). UBSFF has higher revenues than HQY: UBSFF (2.14B) vs HQY (1.27B).
HQYUBSFFHQY / UBSFF
Capitalization8.29B1.53B542%
EBITDA406M888M46%
Gain YTD0.219-14.061-2%
P/E Ratio58.288.69670%
Revenue1.27B2.14B59%
Total Cash304M933M33%
Total Debt1.06B2.34B45%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HQY vs UBSFF: Fundamental Ratings
HQY
UBSFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1888
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
53100
SMR RATING
1..100
7995
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5262
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5892
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HQY's Valuation (80) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as UBSFF (92) in the null industry. This means that HQY’s stock grew similarly to UBSFF’s over the last 12 months.

HQY's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UBSFF (100) in the null industry. This means that HQY’s stock grew somewhat faster than UBSFF’s over the last 12 months.

HQY's SMR Rating (79) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as UBSFF (95) in the null industry. This means that HQY’s stock grew similarly to UBSFF’s over the last 12 months.

HQY's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as UBSFF (62) in the null industry. This means that HQY’s stock grew similarly to UBSFF’s over the last 12 months.

HQY's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UBSFF (92) in the null industry. This means that HQY’s stock grew somewhat faster than UBSFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HQYUBSFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HQY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UBSFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RSEAX18.21N/A
N/A
Russell Inv US Strategic Equity A
STDFX48.43N/A
N/A
Allspring Large Cap Growth Admin
DBUYX10.96N/A
N/A
Davenport Insider Buying
VMGAX790.02N/A
N/A
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth Index Instl
VAPPX23.18N/A
N/A
VALIC Company I Capital Appreciation

HQY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HQY has been loosely correlated with CPAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HQY jumps, then CPAY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HQY
1D Price
Change %
HQY100%
+2.02%
CPAY - HQY
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.37%
EVCM - HQY
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.71%
ALKT - HQY
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
HUBS - HQY
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.68%
INTA - HQY
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.50%
More

UBSFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UBSFF and UBSFY have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UBSFF and UBSFY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UBSFF
1D Price
Change %
UBSFF100%
N/A
UBSFY - UBSFF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTHRY - UBSFF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FMZNF - UBSFF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VERX - UBSFF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.46%
HQY - UBSFF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
More