It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HQY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQLYS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HQY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QLYS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
HQY (@Packaged Software) experienced а -4.51% price change this week, while QLYS (@Packaged Software) price change was -5.19% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.83%.
HQY is expected to report earnings on Mar 25, 2025.
QLYS is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
HQY | QLYS | HQY / QLYS | |
Capitalization | 7.03B | 6.17B | 114% |
EBITDA | 284M | 190M | 149% |
Gain YTD | 37.391 | -25.667 | -146% |
P/E Ratio | 127.55 | 41.51 | 307% |
Revenue | 1B | 554M | 181% |
Total Cash | 404M | 426M | 95% |
Total Debt | 933M | 28.7M | 3,251% |
HQY | QLYS | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 73 | 54 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 74 Overvalued | 75 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 51 | 47 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 87 | 21 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 84 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HQY's Valuation (74) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as QLYS (75) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that HQY’s stock grew similarly to QLYS’s over the last 12 months.
QLYS's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as HQY (51) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that QLYS’s stock grew similarly to HQY’s over the last 12 months.
QLYS's SMR Rating (21) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for HQY (87) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that QLYS’s stock grew significantly faster than HQY’s over the last 12 months.
HQY's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as QLYS (52) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that HQY’s stock grew similarly to QLYS’s over the last 12 months.
QLYS's P/E Growth Rating (84) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as HQY (98) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that QLYS’s stock grew similarly to HQY’s over the last 12 months.
HQY | QLYS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 3 days ago56% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 2 days ago81% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago60% | 2 days ago68% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago64% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago66% | 2 days ago64% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago66% | 2 days ago60% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 15 days ago67% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago66% | 2 days ago69% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% | 2 days ago84% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HQY has been loosely correlated with PDFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HQY jumps, then PDFS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HQY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HQY | 100% | -2.23% | ||
PDFS - HQY | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.98% | ||
PLUS - HQY | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.55% | ||
CYBR - HQY | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.42% | ||
QLYS - HQY | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.22% | ||
ALKT - HQY | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.54% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLYS has been loosely correlated with TENB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QLYS jumps, then TENB could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLYS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
QLYS | 100% | -0.22% | ||
TENB - QLYS | 54% Loosely correlated | -2.28% | ||
DJCO - QLYS | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.02% | ||
FOXO - QLYS | 50% Loosely correlated | -8.80% | ||
RPD - QLYS | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.54% | ||
SPSC - QLYS | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.06% | ||
More |