Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HQGO vs SCHG
HQGO vs SCHG Comparison
Open Charts HQGO vs SCHG
Hartford US Quality Growth ETF
Price$59.20
Change-$1.12 (-1.86%)
Volume$207
Net Assets49.79M
Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF™
Price$32.25
Change-$0.75 (-2.27%)
Volume$17.27M
Net Assets51.53B
HQGO vs SCHG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HQGO vs. SCHG commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HQGO is a Hold and SCHG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHG has more net assets: 51.5B vs. HQGO (49.8M). SCHG has a higher annual dividend yield than HQGO: SCHG (18.756) vs HQGO (11.475). HQGO was incepted earlier than SCHG: HQGO (2 years) vs SCHG (16 years). SCHG (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than HQGO (0.34).
| HQGO | SCHG | HQGO / SCHG | |
| Gain YTD | 11.475 | 18.756 | 61% |
| Net Assets | 49.8M | 51.5B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.04 | 850% |
| Turnover | N/A | 3.00 | - |
| Yield | 0.42 | 0.35 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| HQGO | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 39% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 17 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
HQGO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HQGO has been loosely correlated with NTAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HQGO jumps, then NTAP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HQGO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HQGO | 100% | -0.16% | ||
| NTAP - HQGO | 43% Loosely correlated | +1.04% | ||
| AAPL - HQGO | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.65% | ||
| PPG - HQGO | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.65% | ||
| EQIX - HQGO | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.95% | ||
| NXPI - HQGO | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.60% | ||
More | ||||
SCHG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHG has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHG jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHG | 100% | -0.12% | ||
| AMZN - SCHG | 80% Closely correlated | -1.97% | ||
| NVDA - SCHG | 79% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| PH - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| MSFT - SCHG | 76% Closely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| META - SCHG | 75% Closely correlated | -2.88% | ||
More | ||||