Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HQGO vs SCHG
HQGO vs SCHG Comparison
Open Charts HQGO vs SCHG
Hartford US Quality Growth ETF
Price$58.72
Change+$0.29 (+0.50%)
Volume$808
Net Assets48.23M
Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF™
Price$31.92
Change+$0.18 (+0.57%)
Volume$13.45M
Net Assets50.71B
HQGO vs SCHG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HQGO vs. SCHG commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HQGO is a Hold and SCHG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHG has more net assets: 50.7B vs. HQGO (48.2M). SCHG has a higher annual dividend yield than HQGO: SCHG (14.870) vs HQGO (8.513). HQGO was incepted earlier than SCHG: HQGO (2 years) vs SCHG (16 years). SCHG (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than HQGO (0.34).
| HQGO | SCHG | HQGO / SCHG | |
| Gain YTD | 8.513 | 14.870 | 57% |
| Net Assets | 48.2M | 50.7B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.04 | 850% |
| Turnover | N/A | 3.00 | - |
| Yield | 0.43 | 0.37 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| HQGO | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 31% | 2 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 17 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 56% | 9 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
HQGO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HQGO has been loosely correlated with NTAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HQGO jumps, then NTAP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HQGO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HQGO | 100% | +0.49% | ||
| NTAP - HQGO | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.28% | ||
| PPG - HQGO | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| AAPL - HQGO | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.96% | ||
| CTSH - HQGO | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.93% | ||
| RL - HQGO | 38% Loosely correlated | +1.42% | ||
More | ||||
SCHG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHG has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHG jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHG | 100% | +0.57% | ||
| AMZN - SCHG | 80% Closely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| NVDA - SCHG | 80% Closely correlated | +0.78% | ||
| PH - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | +1.02% | ||
| META - SCHG | 77% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| MSFT - SCHG | 76% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
More | ||||