60 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HQGO vs NTAP
HQGO vs NTAP Comparison
Open Charts HQGO vs NTAP
Hartford US Quality Growth ETF
Price$58.40
Change-$0.42 (-0.71%)
Volume$107
Net Assets48.18M
NetApp
Price$120.18
Change-$0.60 (-0.50%)
Volume$3.42K
Capitalization24.11B
HQGO vs NTAP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HQGO vs. NTAP commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HQGO is a Buy and NTAP is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NTAP: Fundamental Ratings
NTAP | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 75 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 19 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 32 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 12 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 12 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| HQGO | NTAP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 53% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 90% | 9 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 52% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
HQGO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HQGO has been loosely correlated with NTAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HQGO jumps, then NTAP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HQGO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HQGO | 100% | -0.62% | ||
| NTAP - HQGO | 43% Loosely correlated | -2.00% | ||
| PPG - HQGO | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.48% | ||
| AAPL - HQGO | 40% Loosely correlated | +1.81% | ||
| CTSH - HQGO | 37% Loosely correlated | -2.47% | ||
| RL - HQGO | 37% Loosely correlated | -2.92% | ||
More | ||||
NTAP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NTAP has been closely correlated with PSTG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NTAP jumps, then PSTG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NTAP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTAP | 100% | -2.00% | ||
| PSTG - NTAP | 73% Closely correlated | -1.63% | ||
| DELL - NTAP | 68% Closely correlated | -0.86% | ||
| HPQ - NTAP | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.36% | ||
| WDC - NTAP | 58% Loosely correlated | -2.26% | ||
| FFIV - NTAP | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.14% | ||
More | ||||