Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HQGO vs IWF
HQGO vs IWF Comparison
Open Charts HQGO vs IWF
Hartford US Quality Growth ETF
Price$55.73
Change-$0.28 (-0.50%)
Volume$100
Net Assets45.98M
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$445.94
Change+$0.02 (+0.00%)
Volume$700
Net Assets116.57B
HQGO vs IWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HQGO vs. IWF commentary
Aug 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HQGO is a Hold and IWF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 117B vs. HQGO (46M). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than HQGO: IWF (11.271) vs HQGO (1.384). HQGO was incepted earlier than IWF: HQGO (2 years) vs IWF (25 years). IWF (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than HQGO (0.34). HQGO has a higher turnover IWF (12.00) vs IWF (12.00).
| HQGO | IWF | HQGO / IWF | |
| Gain YTD | 1.384 | 11.271 | 12% |
| Net Assets | 46M | 117B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.19 | 179% |
| Turnover | 34.00 | 12.00 | 283% |
| Yield | 0.49 | 0.40 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| HQGO | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | 4 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 50% | 4 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 45% | 4 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 90% | 12 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FTDS | 53.31 | 0.29 | +0.55% |
| First Trust Dividend Strength ETF | |||
| XBJL | 36.65 | 0.16 | +0.43% |
| Innovator US Eq Acclrtd 9 Bffr ETF Jul | |||
| AIRR | 88.70 | 0.32 | +0.36% |
| First Trust RBA Amer Indl RenaisTM ETF | |||
| GAEM | 26.10 | 0.03 | +0.13% |
| Simplify Gamma Emerging Market Bond ETF | |||
| DBND | 46.06 | -0.07 | -0.14% |
| DoubleLine Opportunistic Core Bond ETF | |||
HQGO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HQGO has been loosely correlated with NTAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HQGO jumps, then NTAP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HQGO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HQGO | 100% | N/A | ||
| NTAP - HQGO | 44% Loosely correlated | +2.27% | ||
| AAPL - HQGO | 44% Loosely correlated | +4.24% | ||
| PPG - HQGO | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.78% | ||
| CTSH - HQGO | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.67% | ||
| CSCO - HQGO | 42% Loosely correlated | +2.70% | ||
More | ||||
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | +0.82% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 75% Closely correlated | -0.55% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | -0.20% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 71% Closely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| LRCX - IWF | 69% Closely correlated | +2.62% | ||
More | ||||