Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HQGO vs IWF
HQGO vs IWF Comparison
Open Charts HQGO vs IWF
Hartford US Quality Growth ETF
Price$60.95
Change-$0.05 (-0.08%)
Volume$229
Net Assets50.3M
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$480.33
Change-$0.14 (-0.03%)
Volume$1.32M
Net Assets127.52B
HQGO vs IWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HQGO vs. IWF commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HQGO is a Buy and IWF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 128B vs. HQGO (50.3M). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than HQGO: IWF (19.966) vs HQGO (12.630). HQGO was incepted earlier than IWF: HQGO (2 years) vs IWF (26 years). IWF (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than HQGO (0.34).
| HQGO | IWF | HQGO / IWF | |
| Gain YTD | 12.630 | 19.966 | 63% |
| Net Assets | 50.3M | 128B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.18 | 189% |
| Turnover | N/A | 13.00 | - |
| Yield | 0.42 | 0.35 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 26 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| HQGO | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 13 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
HQGO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HQGO has been loosely correlated with NTAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HQGO jumps, then NTAP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HQGO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HQGO | 100% | +0.91% | ||
| NTAP - HQGO | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.41% | ||
| EQIX - HQGO | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.60% | ||
| PPG - HQGO | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.74% | ||
| AAPL - HQGO | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| NXPI - HQGO | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.06% | ||
More | ||||
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -0.03% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | +0.36% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -0.06% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +0.20% | ||
More | ||||