Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HQGO vs IWF
HQGO vs IWF Comparison
Open Charts HQGO vs IWF
Hartford US Quality Growth ETF
Price$57.29
Change+$1.05 (+1.87%)
Volume$333
Net Assets47.39M
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$449.29
Change-$0.78 (-0.17%)
Volume$1.03M
Net Assets117.41B
HQGO vs IWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HQGO vs. IWF commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HQGO is a Hold and IWF is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 117B vs. HQGO (47.4M). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than HQGO: IWF (12.109) vs HQGO (5.780). HQGO was incepted earlier than IWF: HQGO (2 years) vs IWF (25 years). IWF (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than HQGO (0.34). HQGO has a higher turnover IWF (13.00) vs IWF (13.00).
| HQGO | IWF | HQGO / IWF | |
| Gain YTD | 5.780 | 12.109 | 48% |
| Net Assets | 47.4M | 117B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.18 | 189% |
| Turnover | 34.00 | 13.00 | 262% |
| Yield | 0.48 | 0.40 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| HQGO | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | 4 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 40% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 57% | 5 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
HQGO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HQGO has been loosely correlated with NTAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HQGO jumps, then NTAP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HQGO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HQGO | 100% | N/A | ||
| NTAP - HQGO | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.07% | ||
| AAPL - HQGO | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| PPG - HQGO | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| CTSH - HQGO | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.52% | ||
| ECL - HQGO | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.50% | ||
More | ||||
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -0.17% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -2.55% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 75% Closely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | -1.42% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 71% Closely correlated | -0.63% | ||
| LRCX - IWF | 69% Closely correlated | +2.52% | ||
More | ||||