Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HQGO vs IWF
HQGO vs IWF Comparison
Open Charts HQGO vs IWF
Hartford US Quality Growth ETF
Price$54.72
Change-$0.05 (-0.09%)
Volume$2.32K
Net Assets45.16M
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$435.40
Change+$1.14 (+0.26%)
Volume$1.26M
Net Assets113.41B
HQGO vs IWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HQGO vs. IWF commentary
Jul 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HQGO is a Buy and IWF is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 113B vs. HQGO (45.2M). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than HQGO: IWF (8.643) vs HQGO (1.037). HQGO was incepted earlier than IWF: HQGO (2 years) vs IWF (25 years). IWF (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than HQGO (0.34). HQGO has a higher turnover IWF (12.00) vs IWF (12.00).
| HQGO | IWF | HQGO / IWF | |
| Gain YTD | 1.037 | 8.643 | 12% |
| Net Assets | 45.2M | 113B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.19 | 179% |
| Turnover | 34.00 | 12.00 | 283% |
| Yield | 0.50 | 0.42 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| HQGO | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 50% | 5 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 71% | 5 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 75% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 56% | 5 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% | 5 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 58% | 5 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
HQGO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HQGO has been loosely correlated with NTAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HQGO jumps, then NTAP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HQGO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HQGO | 100% | N/A | ||
| NTAP - HQGO | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.84% | ||
| AAPL - HQGO | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.62% | ||
| PPG - HQGO | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.01% | ||
| TT - HQGO | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.08% | ||
| NXPI - HQGO | 43% Loosely correlated | +1.05% | ||
More | ||||
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | +0.26% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | +0.00% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 75% Closely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +1.40% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 71% Closely correlated | +1.15% | ||
| LRCX - IWF | 69% Closely correlated | +1.07% | ||
More | ||||