Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HQGO vs IWF
HQGO vs IWF Comparison
Open Charts HQGO vs IWF
Hartford US Quality Growth ETF
Price$58.72
Change+$0.29 (+0.50%)
Volume$808
Net Assets48.23M
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$467.12
Change+$2.35 (+0.51%)
Volume$3.09M
Net Assets120.73B
HQGO vs IWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HQGO vs. IWF commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HQGO is a Hold and IWF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 121B vs. HQGO (48.2M). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than HQGO: IWF (16.667) vs HQGO (8.513). HQGO was incepted earlier than IWF: HQGO (2 years) vs IWF (25 years). IWF (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than HQGO (0.34).
| HQGO | IWF | HQGO / IWF | |
| Gain YTD | 8.513 | 16.667 | 51% |
| Net Assets | 48.2M | 121B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.18 | 189% |
| Turnover | N/A | 13.00 | - |
| Yield | 0.43 | 0.35 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| HQGO | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 31% | 2 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 17 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 56% | 9 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
HQGO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HQGO has been loosely correlated with NTAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HQGO jumps, then NTAP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HQGO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HQGO | 100% | +0.49% | ||
| NTAP - HQGO | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.28% | ||
| PPG - HQGO | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| AAPL - HQGO | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.96% | ||
| CTSH - HQGO | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.93% | ||
| RL - HQGO | 38% Loosely correlated | +1.42% | ||
More | ||||
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | +0.51% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | +1.69% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +0.72% | ||
More | ||||