Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HQGO vs IWF
HQGO vs IWF Comparison
Open Charts HQGO vs IWF
Hartford US Quality Growth ETF
Price$53.88
Change+$0.53 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.62M
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$421.70
Change+$2.38 (+0.57%)
Volume$1.37M
Net Assets110.99B
HQGO vs IWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HQGO vs. IWF commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HQGO is a Hold and IWF is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 111B vs. HQGO (44.6M). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than HQGO: IWF (5.225) vs HQGO (-2.395). HQGO was incepted earlier than IWF: HQGO (2 years) vs IWF (25 years). IWF (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than HQGO (0.34). HQGO has a higher turnover IWF (12.00) vs IWF (12.00).
| HQGO | IWF | HQGO / IWF | |
| Gain YTD | -2.395 | 5.225 | -46% |
| Net Assets | 44.6M | 111B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.19 | 179% |
| Turnover | 17.00 | 12.00 | 142% |
| Yield | 0.51 | 0.45 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| HQGO | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 41% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 10 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 42% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
HQGO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HQGO has been loosely correlated with NTAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HQGO jumps, then NTAP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HQGO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HQGO | 100% | N/A | ||
| NTAP - HQGO | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.93% | ||
| ADSK - HQGO | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| AAPL - HQGO | 45% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| PPG - HQGO | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| TT - HQGO | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.72% | ||
More | ||||
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | +0.57% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 75% Closely correlated | +0.46% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +2.85% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 71% Closely correlated | +1.40% | ||
| LRCX - IWF | 69% Closely correlated | +0.40% | ||
More | ||||