Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HQGO vs IVW
HQGO vs IVW Comparison
Open Charts HQGO vs IVW
Hartford US Quality Growth ETF
Price$53.88
Change+$0.53 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.62M
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
Price$109.49
Change+$0.58 (+0.53%)
Volume$1.5M
Net Assets60.32B
HQGO vs IVW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HQGO vs. IVW commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HQGO is a Hold and IVW is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IVW has more net assets: 60.3B vs. HQGO (44.6M). IVW has a higher annual dividend yield than HQGO: IVW (8.084) vs HQGO (-2.395). HQGO was incepted earlier than IVW: HQGO (2 years) vs IVW (25 years). IVW (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than HQGO (0.34). IVW has a higher turnover HQGO (17.00) vs HQGO (17.00).
| HQGO | IVW | HQGO / IVW | |
| Gain YTD | -2.395 | 8.084 | -30% |
| Net Assets | 44.6M | 60.3B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.18 | 189% |
| Turnover | 17.00 | 31.00 | 55% |
| Yield | 0.51 | 0.44 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| HQGO | IVW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 41% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 10 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 42% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
HQGO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HQGO has been loosely correlated with NTAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HQGO jumps, then NTAP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HQGO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HQGO | 100% | N/A | ||
| NTAP - HQGO | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.93% | ||
| ADSK - HQGO | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| AAPL - HQGO | 45% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| PPG - HQGO | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| TT - HQGO | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.72% | ||
More | ||||
IVW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IVW has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IVW jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IVW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IVW | 100% | +0.53% | ||
| META - IVW | 79% Closely correlated | +1.04% | ||
| LRCX - IVW | 79% Closely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| KKR - IVW | 77% Closely correlated | +1.78% | ||
| MPWR - IVW | 76% Closely correlated | +0.12% | ||
| APO - IVW | 75% Closely correlated | +2.56% | ||
More | ||||