Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HQGO vs IVW
HQGO vs IVW Comparison
Open Charts HQGO vs IVW
Hartford US Quality Growth ETF
Price$54.72
Change-$0.05 (-0.09%)
Volume$2.32K
Net Assets45.16M
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
Price$112.65
Change+$0.34 (+0.30%)
Volume$2.11M
Net Assets61.75B
HQGO vs IVW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HQGO vs. IVW commentary
Jul 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HQGO is a Buy and IVW is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IVW has more net assets: 61.8B vs. HQGO (45.2M). IVW has a higher annual dividend yield than HQGO: IVW (11.203) vs HQGO (1.037). HQGO was incepted earlier than IVW: HQGO (2 years) vs IVW (25 years). IVW (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than HQGO (0.34). HQGO has a higher turnover IVW (31.00) vs IVW (31.00).
| HQGO | IVW | HQGO / IVW | |
| Gain YTD | 1.037 | 11.203 | 9% |
| Net Assets | 45.2M | 61.8B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.18 | 189% |
| Turnover | 34.00 | 31.00 | 110% |
| Yield | 0.50 | 0.46 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| HQGO | IVW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 5 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 5 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 5 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 5 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 5 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 15 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 5 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 5 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
HQGO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HQGO has been loosely correlated with NTAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HQGO jumps, then NTAP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HQGO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HQGO | 100% | N/A | ||
| NTAP - HQGO | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.84% | ||
| AAPL - HQGO | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.62% | ||
| PPG - HQGO | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.01% | ||
| TT - HQGO | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.08% | ||
| NXPI - HQGO | 43% Loosely correlated | +1.05% | ||
More | ||||
IVW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IVW has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IVW jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IVW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IVW | 100% | +0.30% | ||
| META - IVW | 80% Closely correlated | +1.65% | ||
| LRCX - IVW | 78% Closely correlated | +1.07% | ||
| KKR - IVW | 77% Closely correlated | -1.16% | ||
| WAB - IVW | 76% Closely correlated | -0.96% | ||
| MPWR - IVW | 76% Closely correlated | -0.06% | ||
More | ||||