It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HPQ’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileKTCC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HPQ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KTCC’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
HPQ (@Computer Peripherals) experienced а -2.28% price change this week, while KTCC (@Computer Peripherals) price change was -1.51% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Peripherals industry was +2.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +16.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.89%.
HPQ is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.
KTCC is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2025.
Computer peripherals connect to a computer system to add functionality or to get information from or put information into computers. Think hard disk drive, data storage systems, cloud storage devices, printer and scanner, or mouse, keyboard etc. Some of the major companies operating in the computer peripherals industry include Western Digital Corporation, Seagate Technology PLC, NetApp, Inc., Zebra Technologies Corporation, and Xerox Holdings Corp.
HPQ | KTCC | HPQ / KTCC | |
Capitalization | 29.6B | 50.9M | 58,153% |
EBITDA | 4.54B | 27M | 16,796% |
Gain YTD | 24.322 | 36.111 | 67% |
P/E Ratio | 8.91 | 11.82 | 75% |
Revenue | 53.1B | 620M | 8,565% |
Total Cash | 2.26B | 2.95M | 76,634% |
Total Debt | 10.9B | 133M | 8,195% |
HPQ | KTCC | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 69 | 73 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 5 Undervalued | 87 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 20 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 46 | 85 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HPQ's Valuation (5) in the Computer Processing Hardware industry is significantly better than the same rating for KTCC (87) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that HPQ’s stock grew significantly faster than KTCC’s over the last 12 months.
HPQ's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Computer Processing Hardware industry is significantly better than the same rating for KTCC (100) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that HPQ’s stock grew significantly faster than KTCC’s over the last 12 months.
HPQ's SMR Rating (46) in the Computer Processing Hardware industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KTCC (85) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that HPQ’s stock grew somewhat faster than KTCC’s over the last 12 months.
KTCC's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as HPQ (47) in the Computer Processing Hardware industry. This means that KTCC’s stock grew similarly to HPQ’s over the last 12 months.
KTCC's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HPQ (60) in the Computer Processing Hardware industry. This means that KTCC’s stock grew somewhat faster than HPQ’s over the last 12 months.
HPQ | KTCC | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago58% | 1 day ago62% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 1 day ago72% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago65% | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago60% | 1 day ago67% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago62% | 1 day ago74% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago0% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago54% | 5 days ago67% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago62% | 1 day ago60% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 1 day ago76% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HPQ has been loosely correlated with DELL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HPQ jumps, then DELL could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HPQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HPQ | 100% | -0.87% | ||
DELL - HPQ | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.07% | ||
STX - HPQ | 33% Poorly correlated | -0.82% | ||
NTAP - HPQ | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.35% | ||
WDC - HPQ | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.78% | ||
IONQ - HPQ | 29% Poorly correlated | -2.24% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that KTCC and MKFG have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KTCC and MKFG's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KTCC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
KTCC | 100% | +0.68% | ||
MKFG - KTCC | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.83% | ||
IONQ - KTCC | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.24% | ||
LOGI - KTCC | 17% Poorly correlated | +1.51% | ||
HPQ - KTCC | 16% Poorly correlated | -0.87% | ||
INVE - KTCC | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.55% | ||
More |