HPIFY
Price
$15.70
Change
-$0.07 (-0.44%)
Updated
Jan 22 closing price
Capitalization
8.44B
HRNNF
Price
$36.12
Change
+$0.15 (+0.42%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
21.7B
Interact to see
Advertisement

HPIFY vs HRNNF

Header iconHPIFY vs HRNNF Comparison
Open Charts HPIFY vs HRNNFBanner chart's image
Huadian Power International
Price$15.70
Change-$0.07 (-0.44%)
Volume$200
Capitalization8.44B
Hydro One
Price$36.12
Change+$0.15 (+0.42%)
Volume$21.49K
Capitalization21.7B
HPIFY vs HRNNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HRNNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HPIFY vs. HRNNF commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HPIFY is a Buy and HRNNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (HPIFY: $15.16 vs. HRNNF: $36.12)
Brand notoriety: HPIFY and HRNNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HPIFY: 100% vs. HRNNF: 97%
Market capitalization -- HPIFY: $8.44B vs. HRNNF: $21.7B
HPIFY [@Electric Utilities] is valued at $8.44B. HRNNF’s [@Electric Utilities] market capitalization is $21.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electric Utilities] industry ranges from $146B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electric Utilities] industry is $21.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HPIFY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHRNNF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HPIFY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HRNNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HPIFY is a better buy in the long-term than HRNNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HRNNF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • HRNNF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

HPIFY (@Electric Utilities) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HRNNF (@Electric Utilities) price change was -0.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was -0.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.27%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (-0.14% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HRNNF($21.7B) has a higher market cap than HPIFY($8.44B). HRNNF has higher P/E ratio than HPIFY: HRNNF (23.84) vs HPIFY (8.40). HRNNF YTD gains are higher at: 18.159 vs. HPIFY (-0.444).
HPIFYHRNNFHPIFY / HRNNF
Capitalization8.44B21.7B39%
EBITDAN/A3.05B-
Gain YTD-0.44418.159-2%
P/E Ratio8.4023.8435%
RevenueN/A8.76B-
Total CashN/A71M-
Total DebtN/A18.1B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HPIFY vs HRNNF: Fundamental Ratings
HPIFY
HRNNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1113
SMR RATING
1..100
7769
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7356
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6356
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HPIFY's Valuation (21) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HRNNF (74). This means that HPIFY’s stock grew somewhat faster than HRNNF’s over the last 12 months.

HPIFY's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as HRNNF (13). This means that HPIFY’s stock grew similarly to HRNNF’s over the last 12 months.

HRNNF's SMR Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as HPIFY (77). This means that HRNNF’s stock grew similarly to HPIFY’s over the last 12 months.

HRNNF's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as HPIFY (73). This means that HRNNF’s stock grew similarly to HPIFY’s over the last 12 months.

HRNNF's P/E Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as HPIFY (63). This means that HRNNF’s stock grew similarly to HPIFY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HPIFYHRNNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
46%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
42%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HRNNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CNRG75.731.65
+2.23%
SPDR® Kensho Clean Power ETF
BKMC108.940.84
+0.78%
BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF
SCEC25.450.12
+0.49%
Sterling Capital Enhanced Core Bond ETF
IBIJ26.520.11
+0.41%
iShares iBonds Oct 2033 Term Tips ETF
JGRO89.81-0.05
-0.06%
JPMorgan Active Growth ETF

HPIFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HPIFY and NGG have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HPIFY and NGG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HPIFY
1D Price
Change %
HPIFY100%
N/A
NGG - HPIFY
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.71%
ETR - HPIFY
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.49%
HKVTY - HPIFY
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HRNNF - HPIFY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IESFY - HPIFY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More