HOOD
Price
$59.83
Change
-$1.56 (-2.54%)
Updated
May 15, 02:09 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
17.6B
76 days until earnings call
MATH
Price
$2.43
Change
-$0.19 (-7.25%)
Updated
May 15, 02:17 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
55.42M
Ad is loading...

HOOD vs MATH

Header iconHOOD vs MATH Comparison
Open Charts HOOD vs MATHBanner chart's image
Robinhood Markets
Price$59.83
Change-$1.56 (-2.54%)
Volume$30.87K
Capitalization17.6B
Metalpha Technology Holding
Price$2.43
Change-$0.19 (-7.25%)
Volume$100
Capitalization55.42M
HOOD vs MATH Comparison Chart
Loading...
HOOD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HOOD vs. MATH commentary
May 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HOOD is a Buy and MATH is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 15, 2025
Stock price -- (HOOD: $61.39 vs. MATH: $2.62)
Brand notoriety: HOOD and MATH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HOOD: 84% vs. MATH: 927%
Market capitalization -- HOOD: $17.6B vs. MATH: $55.42M
HOOD [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $17.6B. MATH’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $55.42M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HOOD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMATH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HOOD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MATH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HOOD is a better buy in the long-term than MATH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HOOD’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MATH’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HOOD’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MATH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both HOOD and MATH are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

HOOD (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +22.80% price change this week, while MATH (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +36.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +4.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +18.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +124.10%.

Reported Earning Dates

HOOD is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

MATH is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+4.42% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HOOD($17.6B) has a higher market cap than MATH($55.4M). MATH YTD gains are higher at: 127.826 vs. HOOD (64.761).
HOODMATHHOOD / MATH
Capitalization17.6B55.4M31,769%
EBITDA-460MN/A-
Gain YTD64.761127.82651%
P/E Ratio28.33N/A-
Revenue1.87BN/A-
Total Cash8.44BN/A-
Total Debt3.55BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MATH: Fundamental Ratings
MATH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
31
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
54
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HOODMATH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HOOD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLA347.6813.61
+4.07%
Tesla
GME28.730.34
+1.20%
GameStop Corp
SPY587.590.75
+0.13%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
AAPL212.33-0.60
-0.28%
Apple
BTC.X103539.414000-630.398440
-0.61%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency

HOOD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HOOD has been closely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HOOD jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HOOD
1D Price
Change %
HOOD100%
-1.89%
COIN - HOOD
76%
Closely correlated
+2.53%
IBKR - HOOD
69%
Closely correlated
+0.36%
RIOT - HOOD
67%
Closely correlated
-1.66%
MS - HOOD
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.31%
GS - HOOD
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.29%
More

MATH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MATH and HOOD have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MATH and HOOD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MATH
1D Price
Change %
MATH100%
+2.91%
HOOD - MATH
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.89%
HIVE - MATH
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.55%
CLSK - MATH
28%
Poorly correlated
-3.90%
COIN - MATH
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.53%
ARBK - MATH
28%
Poorly correlated
+10.52%
More