Advertisement
HOFT vs LEG
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HOFT is a Hold and LEG is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HOFT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLEG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- HOFT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- LEG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HOFT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LEG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HOFT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- LEG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
HOFT (@Home Furnishings) experienced а +2.79% price change this week, while LEG (@Home Furnishings) price change was +16.23% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Home Furnishings industry was +4.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.61%.
Reported Earning Dates
HOFT is expected to report earnings on Dec 04, 2025.
LEG is expected to report earnings on Feb 09, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Home Furnishings (+4.68% weekly)The home furnishings industry includes companies that sell items like furniture, appliances, rugs, cooking utensils, and art objects. According to Mordor Intelligence, the U.S. home decor market is estimated to grow at CAGR 7.5% between 2019 and 2024. The market is being increasingly penetrated by e-commerce and m-commerce, while growing urbanization, and, consumers’ rising interest towards home decor are driving demand for the industry. Mohawk Industries, Inc., La-Z-Boy Incorporated, Leggett & Platt, Incorporated are some of the prominent companies in this space. Being usually discretionary for consumers, demand for furnishings could be affected by macroeconomic cycles.
| HOFT | LEG | HOFT / LEG | |
| Capitalization | 127M | 1.54B | 8% |
| EBITDA | -7.71M | 412M | -2% |
| Gain YTD | -16.086 | 22.869 | -70% |
| P/E Ratio | 128.00 | 7.08 | 1,808% |
| Revenue | 376M | 4.24B | 9% |
| Total Cash | 821K | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 50.1M | 1.96B | 3% |
HOFT | LEG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 11 Undervalued | 25 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | 47 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 66 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HOFT's Valuation (11) in the Home Furnishings industry is in the same range as LEG (25). This means that HOFT’s stock grew similarly to LEG’s over the last 12 months.
HOFT's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Home Furnishings industry is in the same range as LEG (100). This means that HOFT’s stock grew similarly to LEG’s over the last 12 months.
LEG's SMR Rating (47) in the Home Furnishings industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HOFT (93). This means that LEG’s stock grew somewhat faster than HOFT’s over the last 12 months.
HOFT's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Home Furnishings industry is in the same range as LEG (52). This means that HOFT’s stock grew similarly to LEG’s over the last 12 months.
HOFT's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Home Furnishings industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LEG (66). This means that HOFT’s stock grew somewhat faster than LEG’s over the last 12 months.
| HOFT | LEG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 57% | 7 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 79% | 7 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 68% | 7 days ago 56% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 67% | 7 days ago 53% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 72% | 7 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 68% | 7 days ago 55% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 18 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 81% | 7 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 78% | N/A |
Advertisement
HOFT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HOFT has been loosely correlated with MLKN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HOFT jumps, then MLKN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HOFT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HOFT | 100% | -1.87% | ||
| MLKN - HOFT | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| MHK - HOFT | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.74% | ||
| ETD - HOFT | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| LZB - HOFT | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| LEG - HOFT | 43% Loosely correlated | -2.85% | ||
More | ||||
LEG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LEG has been loosely correlated with MHK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LEG jumps, then MHK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LEG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEG | 100% | -2.85% | ||
| MHK - LEG | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.74% | ||
| ETD - LEG | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| MLKN - LEG | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| LZB - LEG | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| PATK - LEG | 49% Loosely correlated | +1.90% | ||
More | ||||