HOFT
Price
$9.34
Change
+$0.04 (+0.43%)
Updated
Aug 11, 02:25 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
99.48M
24 days until earnings call
LEG
Price
$8.49
Change
-$0.11 (-1.28%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:32 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.16B
84 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HOFT vs LEG

Header iconHOFT vs LEG Comparison
Open Charts HOFT vs LEGBanner chart's image
Hooker Furnishings
Price$9.34
Change+$0.04 (+0.43%)
Volume$217
Capitalization99.48M
Leggett & Platt
Price$8.49
Change-$0.11 (-1.28%)
Volume$500
Capitalization1.16B
HOFT vs LEG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HOFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LEG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HOFT vs. LEG commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HOFT is a Hold and LEG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (HOFT: $9.30 vs. LEG: $8.60)
Brand notoriety: HOFT and LEG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Home Furnishings industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HOFT: 12% vs. LEG: 70%
Market capitalization -- HOFT: $99.48M vs. LEG: $1.16B
HOFT [@Home Furnishings] is valued at $99.48M. LEG’s [@Home Furnishings] market capitalization is $1.16B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Home Furnishings] industry ranges from $29.61B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Home Furnishings] industry is $3.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HOFT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLEG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HOFT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LEG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HOFT is a better buy in the long-term than LEG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HOFT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LEG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HOFT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • LEG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LEG is a better buy in the short-term than HOFT.

Price Growth

HOFT (@Home Furnishings) experienced а +2.42% price change this week, while LEG (@Home Furnishings) price change was +6.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Home Furnishings industry was -0.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.83%.

Reported Earning Dates

HOFT is expected to report earnings on Sep 04, 2025.

LEG is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Home Furnishings (-0.15% weekly)

The home furnishings industry includes companies that sell items like furniture, appliances, rugs, cooking utensils, and art objects. According to Mordor Intelligence, the U.S. home decor market is estimated to grow at CAGR 7.5% between 2019 and 2024. The market is being increasingly penetrated by e-commerce and m-commerce, while growing urbanization, and, consumers’ rising interest towards home decor are driving demand for the industry. Mohawk Industries, Inc., La-Z-Boy Incorporated, Leggett & Platt, Incorporated are some of the prominent companies in this space. Being usually discretionary for consumers, demand for furnishings could be affected by macroeconomic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LEG($1.16B) has a higher market cap than HOFT($99.5M). HOFT has higher P/E ratio than LEG: HOFT (128.00) vs LEG (8.35). LEG YTD gains are higher at: -9.434 vs. HOFT (-30.776). HOFT has less debt than LEG: HOFT (69M) vs LEG (2.11B).
HOFTLEGHOFT / LEG
Capitalization99.5M1.16B9%
EBITDA-4.9MN/A-
Gain YTD-30.776-9.434326%
P/E Ratio128.008.351,533%
Revenue389MN/A-
Total Cash18MN/A-
Total Debt69M2.11B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HOFT vs LEG: Fundamental Ratings
HOFT
LEG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9397
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6483
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
242
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HOFT's Valuation (8) in the Home Furnishings industry is in the same range as LEG (26). This means that HOFT’s stock grew similarly to LEG’s over the last 12 months.

HOFT's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Home Furnishings industry is in the same range as LEG (100). This means that HOFT’s stock grew similarly to LEG’s over the last 12 months.

HOFT's SMR Rating (93) in the Home Furnishings industry is in the same range as LEG (97). This means that HOFT’s stock grew similarly to LEG’s over the last 12 months.

HOFT's Price Growth Rating (64) in the Home Furnishings industry is in the same range as LEG (83). This means that HOFT’s stock grew similarly to LEG’s over the last 12 months.

HOFT's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Home Furnishings industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LEG (42). This means that HOFT’s stock grew somewhat faster than LEG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HOFTLEG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HOFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LEG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYCTX288.574.32
+1.52%
Rydex S&P 500 2x Strategy C
PRISX46.710.41
+0.89%
T. Rowe Price Financial Services
OPPAX101.000.27
+0.27%
Invesco Global A
RYCIX152.730.40
+0.26%
Rydex Consumer Products Inv
THGIX26.20-0.15
-0.57%
Thornburg International Growth R6

HOFT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HOFT has been loosely correlated with ETD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HOFT jumps, then ETD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HOFT
1D Price
Change %
HOFT100%
-3.23%
ETD - HOFT
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
LZB - HOFT
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.79%
MLKN - HOFT
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.30%
LEG - HOFT
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
MBC - HOFT
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.58%
More

LEG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LEG has been loosely correlated with ETD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LEG jumps, then ETD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LEG
1D Price
Change %
LEG100%
-0.41%
ETD - LEG
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
MLKN - LEG
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.30%
MHK - LEG
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.13%
LZB - LEG
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.79%
MBC - LEG
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.58%
More