Advertisement
HOFBF vs XFOR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HOFBF is a Hold and XFOR is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HOFBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileXFOR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- HOFBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- XFOR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HOFBF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XFOR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HOFBF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
- XFOR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
HOFBF (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while XFOR (@Biotechnology) price change was -6.88% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +834.73%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was +22.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +31.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.43%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Major Diversified (-0.81% weekly)Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.
@Biotechnology (+22.40% weekly)Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.
| HOFBF | XFOR | HOFBF / XFOR | |
| Capitalization | 67.7M | 10.7M | 633% |
| EBITDA | -73.54M | 25.2M | -292% |
| Gain YTD | 66.600 | -93.230 | -71% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 0.71 | - |
| Revenue | 266M | 31.4M | 847% |
| Total Cash | 71.9M | 87M | 83% |
| Total Debt | 236M | 78M | 303% |
HOFBF | XFOR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | 34 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 12 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 96 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
XFOR's Valuation (34) in the Biotechnology industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HOFBF (85) in the null industry. This means that XFOR’s stock grew somewhat faster than HOFBF’s over the last 12 months.
XFOR's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as HOFBF (100) in the null industry. This means that XFOR’s stock grew similarly to HOFBF’s over the last 12 months.
XFOR's SMR Rating (12) in the Biotechnology industry is significantly better than the same rating for HOFBF (99) in the null industry. This means that XFOR’s stock grew significantly faster than HOFBF’s over the last 12 months.
HOFBF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for XFOR (96) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that HOFBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than XFOR’s over the last 12 months.
HOFBF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as XFOR (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that HOFBF’s stock grew similarly to XFOR’s over the last 12 months.
| HOFBF | XFOR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 25% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 23% | 4 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 15% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 13% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 19 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 90% |
Advertisement
HOFBF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HOFBF has been closely correlated with ACHV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HOFBF jumps, then ACHV could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HOFBF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HOFBF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ACHV - HOFBF | 72% Closely correlated | -5.30% | ||
| COGT - HOFBF | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.92% | ||
| KROS - HOFBF | 38% Loosely correlated | +2.77% | ||
| XFOR - HOFBF | 35% Loosely correlated | +2.05% | ||
| UNBX - HOFBF | 33% Loosely correlated | -15.66% | ||
More | ||||
XFOR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XFOR has been loosely correlated with ABP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if XFOR jumps, then ABP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XFOR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XFOR | 100% | +2.05% | ||
| ABP - XFOR | 50% Loosely correlated | +2.71% | ||
| HOFBF - XFOR | 35% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| INM - XFOR | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SCPH - XFOR | 30% Poorly correlated | -7.58% | ||
| CRDF - XFOR | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.83% | ||
More | ||||