HOCFF
Price
$256.38
Change
-$15.23 (-5.61%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
20.23B
JGCCY
Price
$20.20
Change
+$1.29 (+6.82%)
Updated
Sep 12 closing price
Capitalization
2.48B
Interact to see
Advertisement

HOCFF vs JGCCY

Header iconHOCFF vs JGCCY Comparison
Open Charts HOCFF vs JGCCYBanner chart's image
Hochtief AG
Price$256.38
Change-$15.23 (-5.61%)
Volume$76
Capitalization20.23B
JGC Holdings
Price$20.20
Change+$1.29 (+6.82%)
Volume$350
Capitalization2.48B
HOCFF vs JGCCY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HOCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JGCCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HOCFF vs. JGCCY commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HOCFF is a Hold and JGCCY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (HOCFF: $256.38 vs. JGCCY: $20.20)
Brand notoriety: HOCFF and JGCCY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HOCFF: 30% vs. JGCCY: 76%
Market capitalization -- HOCFF: $20.23B vs. JGCCY: $2.48B
HOCFF [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $20.23B. JGCCY’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $2.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $15.31T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HOCFF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileJGCCY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HOCFF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • JGCCY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HOCFF is a better buy in the long-term than JGCCY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HOCFF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JGCCY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HOCFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • JGCCY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HOCFF is a better buy in the short-term than JGCCY.

Price Growth

HOCFF (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -6.57% price change this week, while JGCCY (@Engineering & Construction) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +346.22%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (+1.14% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HOCFF($20.2B) has a higher market cap than JGCCY($2.48B). HOCFF has higher P/E ratio than JGCCY: HOCFF (19.91) vs JGCCY (18.46). HOCFF YTD gains are higher at: 89.207 vs. JGCCY (31.457). JGCCY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.5B vs. HOCFF (2.42B). JGCCY has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. HOCFF (5.83B). HOCFF has less debt than JGCCY: HOCFF (668M) vs JGCCY (34.7B). JGCCY has higher revenues than HOCFF: JGCCY (836B) vs HOCFF (37B).
HOCFFJGCCYHOCFF / JGCCY
Capitalization20.2B2.48B814%
EBITDA2.42B8.5B28%
Gain YTD89.20731.457284%
P/E Ratio19.9118.46108%
Revenue37B836B4%
Total Cash5.83B357B2%
Total Debt668M34.7B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HOCFF vs JGCCY: Fundamental Ratings
HOCFF
JGCCY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3138
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
11100
SMR RATING
1..100
134
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3943
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1120
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

JGCCY's Valuation (55) in the null industry is in the same range as HOCFF (60). This means that JGCCY’s stock grew similarly to HOCFF’s over the last 12 months.

HOCFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for JGCCY (100). This means that HOCFF’s stock grew significantly faster than JGCCY’s over the last 12 months.

JGCCY's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as HOCFF (13). This means that JGCCY’s stock grew similarly to HOCFF’s over the last 12 months.

HOCFF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as JGCCY (43). This means that HOCFF’s stock grew similarly to JGCCY’s over the last 12 months.

HOCFF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as JGCCY (20). This means that HOCFF’s stock grew similarly to JGCCY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HOCFFJGCCY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HOCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JGCCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPRC6.092.26
+59.01%
SciSparc Ltd
WHD40.810.46
+1.14%
Cactus
TRMB79.980.10
+0.13%
Trimble
EVGO4.63-0.07
-1.49%
EVgo
ATOM3.91-0.23
-5.56%
Atomera

HOCFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HOCFF and OBSJF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HOCFF and OBSJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HOCFF
1D Price
Change %
HOCFF100%
-5.61%
OBSJF - HOCFF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JGCCY - HOCFF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EFGSF - HOCFF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ESOA - HOCFF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.70%
EFGSY - HOCFF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

JGCCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JGCCY and YITYY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JGCCY and YITYY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JGCCY
1D Price
Change %
JGCCY100%
N/A
YITYY - JGCCY
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JGCCF - JGCCY
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KLRGF - JGCCY
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HOCFF - JGCCY
7%
Poorly correlated
-5.61%
EFGSY - JGCCY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More