Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HNTVX vs SSGSX
HNTVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HNTVX vs SSGSX
Heartland Value Institutional
Price$56.52
Change+$0.78 (+1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets871.19M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.21
Change+$0.63 (+1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.18B
HNTVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HNTVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HNTVX is a StrongBuy and SSGSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.18B vs. HNTVX (871M). HNTVX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HNTVX (0.79) vs SSGSX (0.48). HNTVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HNTVX (18 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than HNTVX (0.91). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. HNTVX (34.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HNTVX: SSGSX (2500) vs HNTVX (500000). HNTVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.57 vs. SSGSX (-13.68). HNTVX return over 5 years is better than : 35.16 vs. SSGSX (4.92).
| HNTVX | SSGSX | HNTVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.26 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.26 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.278 | 0.582 | 2,283% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 2500 | 20,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 871M | 5.18B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.48 | 166% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.57 | -13.68 | 19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.61 | -7.65 | -361% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.16 | 4.92 | 714% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.32 | 17.51 | 247% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement