Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HNTVX vs SSGSX
HNTVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HNTVX vs SSGSX
Heartland Value Institutional
Price$55.56
Change+$0.30 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets863.04M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.38
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.64B
HNTVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HNTVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HNTVX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.64B vs. HNTVX (863M). HNTVX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HNTVX (0.80) vs SSGSX (0.47). HNTVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HNTVX (17 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than HNTVX (0.91). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. HNTVX (34.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HNTVX: SSGSX (2500) vs HNTVX (500000). HNTVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.24 vs. SSGSX (-0.11). HNTVX return over 5 years is better than : 57.21 vs. SSGSX (25.10).
| HNTVX | SSGSX | HNTVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.26 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.26 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.973 | 2.046 | 634% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 2500 | 20,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 863M | 5.64B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 0.47 | 168% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.24 | -0.11 | -11,628% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.59 | 0.11 | 27,290% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.21 | 25.10 | 228% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.44 | 25.48 | 194% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers