Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HNTVX vs SSGSX
HNTVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HNTVX vs SSGSX
Heartland Value Institutional
Price$54.63
Change+$0.10 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets843.42M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$46.37
Change+$0.09 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.22B
HNTVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HNTVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HNTVX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.22B vs. HNTVX (843M). HNTVX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HNTVX (0.81) vs SSGSX (0.49). HNTVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HNTVX (18 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than HNTVX (0.91). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. HNTVX (34.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HNTVX: SSGSX (2500) vs HNTVX (500000). HNTVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.63 vs. SSGSX (-12.62). HNTVX return over 5 years is better than : 40.84 vs. SSGSX (8.71).
| HNTVX | SSGSX | HNTVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.26 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.26 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.082 | -0.129 | -8,575% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 2500 | 20,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 843M | 5.22B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 0.49 | 167% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.63 | -12.62 | 13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.30 | -6.25 | -421% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.84 | 8.71 | 469% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.25 | 20.45 | 221% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement