It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HNST’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSKIN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HNST’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SKIN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
HNST (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +13.84% price change this week, while SKIN (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -6.95% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +2.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.56%.
HNST is expected to report earnings on Aug 08, 2025.
SKIN is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.
Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
HNST | SKIN | HNST / SKIN | |
Capitalization | 388M | 529M | 73% |
EBITDA | -36.15M | -56M | 65% |
Gain YTD | -20.491 | 9.434 | -217% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 53.48 | - |
Revenue | 344M | 398M | 86% |
Total Cash | 32.8M | 523M | 6% |
Total Debt | 29.8M | 752M | 4% |
HNST | SKIN | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago56% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago85% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago72% | 3 days ago84% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago89% | 3 days ago78% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago72% | 3 days ago85% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | 3 days ago77% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago69% | 3 days ago79% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago90% | 6 days ago84% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago89% | 3 days ago86% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago87% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HNST has been loosely correlated with IPAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HNST jumps, then IPAR could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HNST | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HNST | 100% | +5.96% | ||
IPAR - HNST | 37% Loosely correlated | +1.32% | ||
EL - HNST | 28% Poorly correlated | +2.36% | ||
HIMS - HNST | 28% Poorly correlated | +10.36% | ||
EPC - HNST | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.92% | ||
ACU - HNST | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.84% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that SKIN and HNST have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SKIN and HNST's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SKIN | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SKIN | 100% | +0.58% | ||
HNST - SKIN | 29% Poorly correlated | +5.96% | ||
COTY - SKIN | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.40% | ||
ELF - SKIN | 25% Poorly correlated | +1.43% | ||
SPB - SKIN | 24% Poorly correlated | +1.43% | ||
IPAR - SKIN | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.32% | ||
More |