Advertisement
HNSPF vs SBFM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HNSPF is a Hold and SBFM is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HNSPF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSBFM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- HNSPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- SBFM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HNSPF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBFM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HNSPF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
- SBFM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
HNSPF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SBFM (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was +0.63% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +3.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +74.65%.
Reported Earning Dates
SBFM is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Other (+3.51% weekly)Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
| HNSPF | SBFM | HNSPF / SBFM | |
| Capitalization | 9.59B | 6.02M | 159,349% |
| EBITDA | 3.62B | -26.1M | -13,862% |
| Gain YTD | 89.152 | -47.670 | -187% |
| P/E Ratio | 30.21 | 0.88 | 3,446% |
| Revenue | 9.97B | 20.4M | 48,863% |
| Total Cash | 20.9B | 18.8M | 111,170% |
| Total Debt | 4.13B | 674K | 612,760% |
SBFM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 7 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 37 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 14 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| HNSPF | SBFM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 17% | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 24% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 22% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 4 days ago 82% |
Advertisement
HNSPF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HNSPF has been loosely correlated with SBFM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HNSPF jumps, then SBFM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HNSPF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HNSPF | 100% | N/A | ||
| SBFM - HNSPF | 46% Loosely correlated | +1.28% | ||
| GEDSF - HNSPF | 33% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| TSMRF - HNSPF | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ACB - HNSPF | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.62% | ||
| OGI - HNSPF | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.32% | ||
More | ||||
SBFM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBFM has been loosely correlated with HNSPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SBFM jumps, then HNSPF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SBFM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBFM | 100% | +1.28% | ||
| HNSPF - SBFM | 46% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| CHSYF - SBFM | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TLRY - SBFM | 27% Poorly correlated | -2.03% | ||
| EBS - SBFM | 26% Poorly correlated | -4.02% | ||
| ELAN - SBFM | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.57% | ||
More | ||||