Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HNSGX vs WCMLX
HNSGX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts HNSGX vs WCMLX
Harbor Small Cap Growth Retirement
Price$15.11
Change-$0.46 (-2.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.05B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.25
Change-$0.44 (-3.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.88M
HNSGX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HNSGX vs. WCMLX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HNSGX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HNSGX has more cash in the bank: 2.05B vs. WCMLX (41.9M). HNSGX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: HNSGX (0.46) vs WCMLX (0.00). HNSGX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: HNSGX (10 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than HNSGX (0.80). WCMLX (83.00) and HNSGX (79.00) have comparable annual turnover. WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than HNSGX: WCMLX (100000) vs HNSGX (1000000). HNSGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.00 vs. WCMLX (-2.98). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 4.74 vs. HNSGX (-9.02).
| HNSGX | WCMLX | HNSGX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.99 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.79 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.426 | 6.454 | 162% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.05B | 41.9M | 4,890% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.00 | -2.98 | -0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.76 | 22.89 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.02 | 4.74 | -190% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement