Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HNSGX vs WCMLX
HNSGX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts HNSGX vs WCMLX
Harbor Small Cap Growth Retirement
Price$16.60
Change+$1.10 (+7.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.32B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.64
Change+$0.83 (+6.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.08M
HNSGX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HNSGX vs. WCMLX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HNSGX is a StrongBuy and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HNSGX has more cash in the bank: 2.32B vs. WCMLX (47.1M). HNSGX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . HNSGX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: HNSGX (10 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than HNSGX (0.80). HNSGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 106.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than HNSGX: WCMLX (100000) vs HNSGX (1000000). HNSGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.88 vs. WCMLX (8.52). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -5.30 vs. HNSGX (-12.46).
| HNSGX | WCMLX | HNSGX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.99 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.79 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.752 | 6.395 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.32B | 47.1M | 4,917% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.88 | 8.52 | 175% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.16 | 19.51 | 196% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.46 | -5.30 | 235% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement