HNSBF
Price
$2.74
Change
-$0.26 (-8.67%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
262.81M
MLLCF
Price
$4.22
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 25 closing price
Capitalization
134.53M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HNSBF vs MLLCF

Header iconHNSBF vs MLLCF Comparison
Open Charts HNSBF vs MLLCFBanner chart's image
Hansa Medical AB
Price$2.74
Change-$0.26 (-8.67%)
Volume$7.12K
Capitalization262.81M
Molecular Partners AG
Price$4.22
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.33K
Capitalization134.53M
HNSBF vs MLLCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HNSBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HNSBF vs. MLLCF commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HNSBF is a Hold and MLLCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (HNSBF: $2.74 vs. MLLCF: $4.22)
Brand notoriety: HNSBF and MLLCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Biotechnology industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HNSBF: 242% vs. MLLCF: 100%
Market capitalization -- HNSBF: $262.81M vs. MLLCF: $134.53M
HNSBF [@Biotechnology] is valued at $262.81M. MLLCF’s [@Biotechnology] market capitalization is $134.53M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Biotechnology] industry ranges from $93.98B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Biotechnology] industry is $1.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HNSBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMLLCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HNSBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MLLCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MLLCF is a better buy in the long-term than HNSBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HNSBF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • HNSBF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

HNSBF (@Biotechnology) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MLLCF (@Biotechnology) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was +22.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +31.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.43%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Biotechnology (+22.37% weekly)

Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HNSBF($263M) has a higher market cap than MLLCF($135M). MLLCF YTD gains are higher at: 2.676 vs. HNSBF (-8.667). MLLCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -57.15M vs. HNSBF (-506.53M). HNSBF has more cash in the bank: 354M vs. MLLCF (131M). MLLCF has less debt than HNSBF: MLLCF (2.14M) vs HNSBF (906M). HNSBF has higher revenues than MLLCF: HNSBF (196M) vs MLLCF (2.23M).
HNSBFMLLCFHNSBF / MLLCF
Capitalization263M135M195%
EBITDA-506.53M-57.15M886%
Gain YTD-8.6672.676-324%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue196M2.23M8,781%
Total Cash354M131M270%
Total Debt906M2.14M42,317%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HNSBF vs MLLCF: Fundamental Ratings
HNSBF
MLLCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10097
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7774
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10086
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MLLCF's Valuation (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HNSBF (70). This means that MLLCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HNSBF’s over the last 12 months.

MLLCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as HNSBF (100). This means that MLLCF’s stock grew similarly to HNSBF’s over the last 12 months.

MLLCF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as HNSBF (100). This means that MLLCF’s stock grew similarly to HNSBF’s over the last 12 months.

MLLCF's Price Growth Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as HNSBF (77). This means that MLLCF’s stock grew similarly to HNSBF’s over the last 12 months.

MLLCF's P/E Growth Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as HNSBF (100). This means that MLLCF’s stock grew similarly to HNSBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HNSBFMLLCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
24%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
17%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HNSBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DQIRX33.700.33
+0.99%
BNY Mellon Equity Income Fund I
SCCUX11.470.08
+0.70%
Invesco Income Advantage U.S. Fund C
MKVGX16.580.08
+0.48%
MFS International Large Cap Value R4
ERBIX19.810.09
+0.46%
Eaton Vance RBA Equity Strategy Fd Cl I
STTIX9.24-0.01
-0.11%
North Square Core Plus Bond I

HNSBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HNSBF has been loosely correlated with CORT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HNSBF jumps, then CORT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HNSBF
1D Price
Change %
HNSBF100%
N/A
CORT - HNSBF
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.15%
AVXL - HNSBF
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.20%
PMVP - HNSBF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MLLCF - HNSBF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELTX - HNSBF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.43%
More