HNNA
Price
$12.16
Change
-$0.29 (-2.33%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
94.7M
MGLD
Price
$1.04
Change
+$0.02 (+1.96%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
44.83M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HNNA vs MGLD

Header iconHNNA vs MGLD Comparison
Open Charts HNNA vs MGLDBanner chart's image
Hennessy Advisors
Price$12.16
Change-$0.29 (-2.33%)
Volume$32.54K
Capitalization94.7M
Marygold Companies (The)
Price$1.04
Change+$0.02 (+1.96%)
Volume$8.86K
Capitalization44.83M
HNNA vs MGLD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HNNA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HNNA vs. MGLD commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HNNA is a StrongBuy and MGLD is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (HNNA: $12.16 vs. MGLD: $1.04)
Brand notoriety: HNNA and MGLD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HNNA: 320% vs. MGLD: 71%
Market capitalization -- HNNA: $94.7M vs. MGLD: $44.83M
HNNA [@Investment Managers] is valued at $94.7M. MGLD’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $44.83M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HNNA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMGLD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HNNA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MGLD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HNNA is a better buy in the long-term than MGLD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HNNA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGLD’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HNNA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MGLD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MGLD is a better buy in the short-term than HNNA.

Price Growth

HNNA (@Investment Managers) experienced а +4.09% price change this week, while MGLD (@Investment Managers) price change was +13.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.68%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HNNA($94.7M) has a higher market cap than MGLD($44.8M). HNNA YTD gains are higher at: -1.050 vs. MGLD (-40.909). MGLD has more cash in the bank: 15.6M vs. HNNA (565K). MGLD has less debt than HNNA: MGLD (4.92M) vs HNNA (40.5M).
HNNAMGLDHNNA / MGLD
Capitalization94.7M44.8M211%
EBITDAN/A-6.7M-
Gain YTD-1.050-40.9093%
P/E Ratio9.73N/A-
RevenueN/A31.2M-
Total Cash565K15.6M4%
Total Debt40.5M4.92M823%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HNNA vs MGLD: Fundamental Ratings
HNNA
MGLD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3493
SMR RATING
1..100
6996
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4947
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
793
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HNNA's Valuation (15) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for MGLD (85) in the null industry. This means that HNNA’s stock grew significantly faster than MGLD’s over the last 12 months.

HNNA's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MGLD (93) in the null industry. This means that HNNA’s stock grew somewhat faster than MGLD’s over the last 12 months.

HNNA's SMR Rating (69) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as MGLD (96) in the null industry. This means that HNNA’s stock grew similarly to MGLD’s over the last 12 months.

MGLD's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as HNNA (49) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that MGLD’s stock grew similarly to HNNA’s over the last 12 months.

MGLD's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HNNA (79) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that MGLD’s stock grew significantly faster than HNNA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HNNAMGLD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
59%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HNNA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AZTA30.300.78
+2.64%
Azenta
IPWR5.110.02
+0.32%
Ideal Power
OPFI10.460.01
+0.10%
OppFi
KO67.96-0.29
-0.42%
Coca-Cola Company
HRB51.13-0.24
-0.47%
H&R Block

HNNA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HNNA has been loosely correlated with SFFFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HNNA jumps, then SFFFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HNNA
1D Price
Change %
HNNA100%
-2.33%
SFFFF - HNNA
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ENFD - HNNA
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BAM - HNNA
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.25%
TCPC - HNNA
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
TSLX - HNNA
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.77%
More

MGLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MGLD and HNNA have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MGLD and HNNA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGLD
1D Price
Change %
MGLD100%
+1.96%
HNNA - MGLD
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.33%
RESCU - MGLD
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ICMB - MGLD
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
EICA - MGLD
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
EICC - MGLD
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.40%
More