Advertisement
HNFSA vs TBLMF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HNFSA is a Hold and TBLMF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HNFSA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTBLMF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- HNFSA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- TBLMF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HNFSA’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TBLMF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HNFSA’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
- TBLMF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
HNFSA (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -8.57% price change this week, while TBLMF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.17%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.38% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
| HNFSA | TBLMF | HNFSA / TBLMF | |
| Capitalization | N/A | 1.53B | - |
| EBITDA | N/A | 3.93B | - |
| Gain YTD | -17.151 | 13.493 | -127% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 9.29 | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 36.7B | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 658M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 2.79B | - |
HNFSA | TBLMF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 93 | 45 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 36 Fair valued | 30 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 41 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 89 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 41 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TBLMF's Valuation (30) in the null industry is in the same range as HNFSA (36). This means that TBLMF’s stock grew similarly to HNFSA’s over the last 12 months.
TBLMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HNFSA (100). This means that TBLMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HNFSA’s over the last 12 months.
TBLMF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as HNFSA (100). This means that TBLMF’s stock grew similarly to HNFSA’s over the last 12 months.
TBLMF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HNFSA (89). This means that TBLMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HNFSA’s over the last 12 months.
TBLMF's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HNFSA (100). This means that TBLMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HNFSA’s over the last 12 months.
| HNFSA | TBLMF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 58% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 34% | 3 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 36% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 47% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 26% | 3 days ago 49% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 22% | 3 days ago 48% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 33% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 31% | N/A |
Advertisement
HNFSA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HNFSA has been loosely correlated with FRPT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HNFSA jumps, then FRPT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HNFSA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HNFSA | 100% | N/A | ||
| FRPT - HNFSA | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.19% | ||
| TBLMF - HNFSA | 39% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| INGR - HNFSA | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| BRFS - HNFSA | 29% Poorly correlated | -2.22% | ||
| CFEIY - HNFSA | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
TBLMF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TBLMF has been loosely correlated with HNFSA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TBLMF jumps, then HNFSA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TBLMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TBLMF | 100% | N/A | ||
| HNFSA - TBLMF | 39% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| INGR - TBLMF | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.01% | ||
| TSUKY - TBLMF | 10% Poorly correlated | +1.65% | ||
| UVRBF - TBLMF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| UELKY - TBLMF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||