Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HNCSX vs RERBX
HNCSX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts HNCSX vs RERBX
Hartford International Growth R4
Price$22.06
Change+$0.19 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets377.25M
American Funds EUPAC R2
Price$61.72
Change+$0.49 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.15B
HNCSX vs RERBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HNCSX vs. RERBX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HNCSX is a Buy and RERBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 134B vs. HNCSX (377M). RERBX pays higher dividends than HNCSX: RERBX (0.23) vs HNCSX (0.07). HNCSX was incepted earlier than RERBX: HNCSX (19 years) vs RERBX (24 years). RERBX (1.56) is less costly to investors than HNCSX (1.31). RERBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. HNCSX (31.00). HNCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERBX: HNCSX (0) vs RERBX (250). HNCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.43 vs. RERBX (11.24). HNCSX return over 5 years is better than : 17.41 vs. RERBX (-1.39).
| HNCSX | RERBX | HNCSX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.56 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.56 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.479 | 20.197 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 377M | 134B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.23 | 28% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.43 | 11.24 | 182% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.08 | 26.75 | 183% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.41 | -1.39 | -1,249% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.64 | 35.62 | 212% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement