Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HNCSX vs RERBX
HNCSX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts HNCSX vs RERBX
Hartford International Growth R4
Price$22.13
Change-$0.52 (-2.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets374.2M
American Funds EUPAC R2
Price$61.89
Change-$1.07 (-1.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.83B
HNCSX vs RERBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HNCSX vs. RERBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HNCSX is a StrongBuy and RERBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. HNCSX (374M). RERBX pays higher dividends than HNCSX: RERBX (0.23) vs HNCSX (0.06). HNCSX was incepted earlier than RERBX: HNCSX (19 years) vs RERBX (23 years). RERBX (1.56) is less costly to investors than HNCSX (1.31). RERBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. HNCSX (31.00). HNCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERBX: HNCSX (0) vs RERBX (250). HNCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.65 vs. RERBX (16.02). HNCSX return over 5 years is better than : 27.04 vs. RERBX (6.29).
| HNCSX | RERBX | HNCSX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.56 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.56 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.766 | 23.815 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 374M | 139B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.23 | 27% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.65 | 16.02 | 179% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.13 | 33.99 | 174% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.04 | 6.29 | 430% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.52 | 41.87 | 214% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement