Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HNCSX vs RERBX
HNCSX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts HNCSX vs RERBX
Hartford International Growth R4
Price$21.23
Change+$0.23 (+1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets346.08M
American Funds EUPAC R2
Price$58.47
Change+$0.30 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets133.49B
HNCSX vs RERBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HNCSX vs. RERBX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HNCSX is a Buy and RERBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. HNCSX (346M). RERBX pays higher dividends than HNCSX: RERBX (0.25) vs HNCSX (0.07). HNCSX was incepted earlier than RERBX: HNCSX (19 years) vs RERBX (23 years). RERBX (1.56) is less costly to investors than HNCSX (1.31). RERBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. HNCSX (31.00). HNCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERBX: HNCSX (0) vs RERBX (250). HNCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.55 vs. RERBX (7.49). HNCSX return over 5 years is better than : 27.66 vs. RERBX (7.43).
| HNCSX | RERBX | HNCSX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.56 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.56 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.386 | 14.985 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 346M | 133B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.25 | 28% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.55 | 7.49 | 261% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.78 | 32.33 | 197% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.66 | 7.43 | 372% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.72 | 33.45 | 232% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers