Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HNCSX vs RERBX
HNCSX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts HNCSX vs RERBX
Hartford International Growth R4
Price$22.70
Change+$0.47 (+2.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets400.52M
American Funds EUPAC R2
Price$59.82
Change-$1.74 (-2.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.63B
HNCSX vs RERBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HNCSX vs. RERBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HNCSX is a Buy and RERBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. HNCSX (401M). RERBX pays higher dividends than HNCSX: RERBX (2.28) vs HNCSX (0.65). HNCSX was incepted earlier than RERBX: HNCSX (19 years) vs RERBX (24 years). RERBX (1.56) is less costly to investors than HNCSX (1.31). RERBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. HNCSX (31.00). HNCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERBX: HNCSX (0) vs RERBX (250). HNCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.53 vs. RERBX (16.71). HNCSX return over 5 years is better than : 18.73 vs. RERBX (-8.38).
| HNCSX | RERBX | HNCSX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.56 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.56 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.808 | 5.577 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 401M | 135B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 2.28 | 28% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.53 | 16.71 | 159% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.96 | 21.65 | 208% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.73 | -8.38 | -224% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.55 | 57.22 | 186% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers