Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HNCSX vs RERBX
HNCSX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts HNCSX vs RERBX
Hartford International Growth R4
Price$20.07
Change-$0.35 (-1.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets323.39M
American Funds EUPAC R2
Price$55.57
Change-$0.76 (-1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.56B
HNCSX vs RERBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HNCSX vs. RERBX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HNCSX is a Buy and RERBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. HNCSX (323M). RERBX pays higher dividends than HNCSX: RERBX (0.45) vs HNCSX (0.07). HNCSX was incepted earlier than RERBX: HNCSX (18 years) vs RERBX (23 years). RERBX (1.56) is less costly to investors than HNCSX (1.31). HNCSX (31.00) and RERBX (30.00) have comparable annual turnover. HNCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERBX: HNCSX (0) vs RERBX (250). HNCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.97 vs. RERBX (2.46). HNCSX return over 5 years is better than : 37.76 vs. RERBX (14.43).
| HNCSX | RERBX | HNCSX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.56 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.56 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.099 | 9.282 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 323M | 133B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.45 | 16% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.97 | 2.46 | 527% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.40 | 23.03 | 223% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.76 | 14.43 | 262% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.33 | 16.06 | 332% |