Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HNCCX vs RERAX
HNCCX vs RERAX Comparison
Open Charts HNCCX vs RERAX
Hartford International Growth C
Price$18.93
Change-$0.45 (-2.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets383.01M
American Funds EUPAC R1
Price$61.37
Change-$1.05 (-1.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.83B
HNCCX vs RERAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HNCCX vs. RERAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HNCCX is a StrongBuy and RERAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERAX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. HNCCX (383M). RERAX pays higher dividends than HNCCX: RERAX (0.22) vs HNCCX (0.00). HNCCX was incepted earlier than RERAX: HNCCX (25 years) vs RERAX (23 years). HNCCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than RERAX (1.57). RERAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. HNCCX (31.00). RERAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HNCCX: RERAX (250) vs HNCCX (2000). HNCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.87 vs. RERAX (15.94). HNCCX return over 5 years is better than : 18.76 vs. RERAX (6.15).
| HNCCX | RERAX | HNCCX / RERAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 1.57 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 1.57 | 136% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.951 | 23.776 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 383M | 139B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.22 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.87 | 15.94 | 156% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.78 | 33.97 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.76 | 6.15 | 305% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.43 | 41.43 | 168% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement